Talk:Ecopedagogy
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article may be too technical for most readers to understand.(September 2010) |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit] This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bellamelodia, Ariellibelly.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:08, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Untitled
[edit]"The Ecopedagogy movement represents a recent transformation in critical pedagogy that seeks to interpolate quintessentially Freirean pedagogical aims of humanization and social justice with a future-oriented ecological politics that radically opposes the globalization of neoliberalism and imperialism, on the one hand, and which attempts to foment collective ecoliteracy and realize culturally relevant forms of knowledge grounded in normative concepts such as sustainability, planetarity, and biophilia, on the other."
I am a native English speaker, and the above opening line of the article makes pretty much no sense to me, and communicates very little information about the topic at hand. This sounds like it was grabbed at random out of Social Text, and doesn't much sound like a wikipedia article. Dxco (talk) 17:49, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- I am a native English speaker with an Hon. BA in Philosophy, and I agree with you completely. This article needs a complete re-write to bring it into conformity with the English language as spoken by people who live outside of the magical kingdom of Critical Theory. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 16:06, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- I think it's the case of "the medium is the message". There is no real coherence in the article because there is no coherence to the concept of this "pedagogy" in the first place. It's yet another "progressive" and "green" effort to brainwash, "adjust" and keep semiliterate and ignorant the students whose parents didn't have the wisdom or the ability to pull them out of the sort of educational institution that is perpetrating such edicational malpractice upon them. 76.24.104.52 (talk) 05:57, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- I am a native English speaker too and have no difficulty at all. You just need to learn a little about education and the environment. John D. Croft (talk) 04:36, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ecopedagogy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070716195120/http://www.paulofreire.org/Moacir_Gadotti/Artigos/Ingles/On_Education/Pedagogy_of_the_Earth_and_Culture_of_Sustainability_2003.pdf to http://www.paulofreire.org/Moacir_Gadotti/Artigos/Ingles/On_Education/Pedagogy_of_the_Earth_and_Culture_of_Sustainability_2003.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:14, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Proposal for structural and content modification
[edit]Hi Wikicommunity,
I have some proposals for how to make this article better, and I'd love to have a conversation and hear what the community thinks!
The article is not neutral. It has no representation of the criticisms or possible flaws of ecopedagogy. Also, no contrasting viewpoint on the drawbacks/downsides of this education style are presented.
Also, The theory of ecopedagogy gets ample screen-time, but the actual praxis of ecopedagogy gets zero. This provides a great opportunity for improvement, since it would really beef up the article to show how this has actually been put into practice, how it was received, its successes, failures, etc.
Finally, it goes without saying that the article is way too technical, and we need to make it more accessible for the average Wikipedia reader.
Thanks and I look forward to your feedback! Ariellibelly (talk) 20:24, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Additional suggestions for modification
[edit]Hi all,
I agree with the above comments and would like to reiterate the importance of simplifying this article's language to make it more accessable to everyone; including pros and cons of ecopedagogy; including specific examples of past and current praxis of ecopedagogy; and outlining a general trajectory which it is following given current world contexts (which are of course different than the contexts in which ecopedagogy was formed).
I also wonder why there isn't an article by this name in other languages, considering the prominence of ecopedagogy and its founders in Latin America, and its international scope. I wonder whether it might be useful/feasible to create such pages in other languages.
I hope to be in conversation and collaboration with anyone who is invested in making this article stonger! bellamelodia (talk) 21:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Organizational edits
[edit]Hi all, I'm in the process of editing this page. Some of the things I am doing are: 1) organizing existing references (into number-citation wiki format) 2) adding citations to support claims where necessary 3) removing/rewriting completely plagiarized content 4) clarifying/simplifying existing sentences 5) adding information about the historical background and current praxis I hope that these changes seem appropriate to people. Feel free to leave feedback if necessary. bellamelodia (talk) 00:50, 4 May 2018 (UTC)