Jump to content

Talk:Georgia Right to Life

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled]

[edit]

Google News shows there are sources discussing this organization [1]. But the current article is not encyclopedic and seems to use Wikipedia as a webhost for the organization, without including any reliable independent sources. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:30, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

[edit]

This article has obviously been written by a member of the organisation. It is written like an advert, emphasizing the opinions of the organisation, without any criticism (if there is any). The article directly quotes the organisation, and a large proportion of the references are from non-neutral (pro life) group. Most of the external links are pro-life groups. user:Martin451

Agreed. The content should be based mostly on reliable independent sources. A google news search shows there are sources (and I haven't look at Google books to see if there's anything there) so that's the place to start. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:36, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


How should the current language be changed so it reads more like a neutral encyclopedia? Are there positive adjectives or suggestions in the text that I missed? user: Mission: Life

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Georgia Right to Life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Georgia Right to Life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]