Talk:Hamad
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Al Futaisi Island
[edit]This someone is not just someone. He is a big man, a royal family member or something. And he has his own wikipedia page I believe.175.103.25.137 (talk) 10:20, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- See also the mention in the Al Futaisi article and in search results here. I don't believe that this person currently reaches the inclusion threshold for mention in this WP:disambiguation page. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 12:23, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- Yup. this pertains to this edit by the IP, adding the island owned by the person in question. I initially removed it but then restored it, moved it to a more appropriate place in the list, and rewrote it to clarify why it was being listed [1]. As I said in my edit summary, "No objection ftom me if anyone thinks this still does not belong" Someone having dug huge trench to spell their name is a weak reason to include. Meters (talk) 23:28, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
- It doesn't seem to me that this meets WP:GNG. I delete articles from time to time, but I'm generally very soft on MW:Deletionism. That article isn't a complete WP:orphan, but it's close and is linked from other articles where the notability status is questionable. I wouldn't object if a deletionist came along and axed it, but perhaps it should be WP:PRODed; that would probably lead either to deletion or to a talk page discussion working towards consensus about whether to delete it, defer deletion, or open a WP:AFD discussion. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:23, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
- I was thinking the same. The article about the island is just an excuse to mention the Sheikh's grandiose (and failed) exercise in self-publicity. Meters (talk) 01:50, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
- Well, even though the thing has failed, I guess it is still okay to stay.175.103.25.137 (talk) 11:29, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
- I was thinking the same. The article about the island is just an excuse to mention the Sheikh's grandiose (and failed) exercise in self-publicity. Meters (talk) 01:50, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
- It doesn't seem to me that this meets WP:GNG. I delete articles from time to time, but I'm generally very soft on MW:Deletionism. That article isn't a complete WP:orphan, but it's close and is linked from other articles where the notability status is questionable. I wouldn't object if a deletionist came along and axed it, but perhaps it should be WP:PRODed; that would probably lead either to deletion or to a talk page discussion working towards consensus about whether to delete it, defer deletion, or open a WP:AFD discussion. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 00:23, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
- Yup. this pertains to this edit by the IP, adding the island owned by the person in question. I initially removed it but then restored it, moved it to a more appropriate place in the list, and rewrote it to clarify why it was being listed [1]. As I said in my edit summary, "No objection ftom me if anyone thinks this still does not belong" Someone having dug huge trench to spell their name is a weak reason to include. Meters (talk) 23:28, 16 June 2019 (UTC)