Jump to content

Talk:History of Palm Beach County, Florida

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:History of Palm Beach County, Florida/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: I'ma editor2022 (talk · contribs) 01:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


GA Notice

[edit]
GA Notice
Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article History of Palm Beach County, Florida in which you've been a major contributor, and has been nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

| Remember, Imurmate I'ma editor2022 (talk) 01:06, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
· · ·

Review

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    The prose is a bit long, but is is very informative and informational.
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
    Complies with all.
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
    None saw as well as no discussion on talk page.
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    I think this article was a very informative (and interesting!) read, especially since I do live in the Palm Beach County area, I also commend the quality of the article. I actually would recommend nominating this for a Featured Article status (buut I'll leave that to you), but that's your decision and for now I grant you the Good Article status. Wear it as a badge of honor!