Jump to content

Talk:Holocaust victims/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SilverplateDelta (talk · contribs) 13:29, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article Criteria Table

[edit]

Will be filled in as I progress with the review.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (No original research):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.: I recommend suggesting the article for temporary semi-protection.
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): All but 1 images are in the public domain. The odd one out is the work of the poster.
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Notes

[edit]

—I see an edit war in this articles future. The page has been vandalized 4 times in the past week. This will detract from the over all score. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SilverplateDelta (talkcontribs) 13:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have been watching the article, the issue seems to have been resolved, therefore PASSING its GA review.