Jump to content

Talk:Internet Communications Engine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Expansion

[edit]
  • I have changed the structure of the article and added sections about Ice components

--Malin Randstrom (talk) 07:55, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Internet Communications Engine How come ! This is free s/w. I am a software architect in the finance industry and use not only this product but also a set of others. I did not create the article; I have rebuilt most of it to describe important mechanism and concepts in the field of middleware. The article needs improvements, but it should not at all be subject for deletion.

(copied from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Malin_Tokyo#Internet_Communications_Engine) I don't think ICE should be deleted - that just seems to come with the advert template. It just seemed like it needed a more balanced article, with the good and the bad, and more sourcing of information rather than relying on original research or the ICE site. --NealMcB (talk) 00:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I changed the "advert" template to "refimprove" --NealMcB (talk) 02:30, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent updates are helpful - thank you for that and for your enthusiasm. But remember that wikipedia is not an open tech research blog, it is an encyclopedia that needs to be based on reliable published sources. The article still seems to lack much balance, comparison to competitors, etc. Also, there still seems to be hardly any reference to any reliable sources other than a single external link. Are you basing your comments on your own research? ([original research?]) --NealMcB (talk) 00:36, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
...and even the external reference I was thinking of (the one to the ACM Queue article) was written by the authors of the ICE software. Independent published references would be much better. --NealMcB (talk) 03:39, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK - there are three other major middleware in this category and those are TIBCO Rendezvous, Smartsockets and CORBA... I have designed realt-time systems based on those as well and have started to describe those as alternatives to ICE along with improved referencing. Smartsockets pointed to a article about TIBCO w/o any informatiom about the technology... I removed the redirect and started describing it instead. --Malin Randstrom (talk) 11:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citation

[edit]

Ummm, why do we have to cite the source for a source?--129.97.99.14 (talk) 16:37, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright?

[edit]

Why does the chart of ICE components include a copyright notice? Is this even acceptable in Wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.166.249.66 (talk) 11:27, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Internet Communications Engine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:57, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]