Talk:John L. C. Wickham
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
[edit]Comment: This individual does not appear to satisfy political notability oder general notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:06, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
@Robert McClenon:Hi Robert, in regards to your comment above, as the person is a judge of Western Australia's highest court, the Supreme Court, he does satisfy the political notability standard. Is this a matter of requiring more sources? Username (Lawlllllll) 02:49, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- stub status - the nature of the referencing style does not give it start status JarrahTree 10:43, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
- I think that the "nature of the referencing style" (presumably the use of direct external links rather than {{cite}} templates) is not the impediment to "Start" class. I suggest that difference between the Stub and Start quality scale criteria for references is the number and reliability of the sources, rather than whether they are wrapped in {{cite}}. (classically unsigned)
- You think - if it is a new user I see no reason why they should be rewarded for poor referencing method, specially if they have been through supposed review process JarrahTree 13:20, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Kategorien:
- Stub-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/10 November 2018
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Stub-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Stub-Class Western Australia articles
- Low-importance Western Australia articles
- WikiProject Western Australia articles
- Stub-Class Australian law articles
- Low-importance Australian law articles
- WikiProject Australian law articles
- WikiProject Australia articles