Talk:Key School
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Maryland may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Kommentar
[edit]This article is very subjective and biased, not at all like a competent encyclopedia article. Please revise.
- I think it's well-written myself, but I've removed a couple POV terms, as well as some minor grammar errors. I do think this article should list some former headmasters, such as Ron Golblat. Lizardking42 17:30, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- i'm ordinarily very sensitive to bias in articles., but i don't see anything but factual statements here. the tags have been there apparently for 18 months and no one seems overly concerned. i'm removing them.Toyokuni3 (talk) 05:08, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
You spelled GOLDBLATT wrong. He would elbow you in the eye with his leather patches if he knew of this travesty. That is all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.183.162.85 (talk) 03:05, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Granted, I spelled his name wrong. However, I'm pretty sure Mr. Magus wouldn't like his last name spelt Mr. Maggotpiss. Lizardking42 15:49, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
hi —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.141.22.114 (talk) 19:13, 10 October 2007 (UTC) No I asked he said he doesn't mind. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.148.27.243 (talk) 02:42, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
A shitty article for a shitty school. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.19.82.104 (talk) 19:58, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Much of the text seems to be copied from the Key School website. We need a vast revamp of this article. Mwfogleman (talk) 02:46, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Copyright violations
[edit]This is just a note to say that with this edit I re-instated a version of the page that has been edit warred over. I did this because the entire article, bar a small part of the lead section, was blatantly copied from various parts of the school website. This must not be reinstated as we have a responsibility to make sure that articles do not contain copyrighted material, especially when it is so blatant. -- Mrmatiko (talk) 06:13, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
2021 espionage charges against a faculty member
[edit]Please do not mention the faculty member in question in the main article until there is a confirmed result of their trial. WP:SUSPECT is clear that we should not discuss allegations against non-public figures. I am very concerned about the allegations, and could say a lot about them, but nonetheless this page is not the place. WikiMaster111 (talk) 20:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)