Jump to content

Talk:Kitefin shark/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I am reviewing this article for GA. It is excellent in every way. I have read it through several times for enjoyment.

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): Clearly and concisely written b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS guidelines
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): Comprehensively referenced b (citations to reliable sources): References are to reliable sources c (OR): No OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): Covers the major aspects b (focused): Remains focused on topic
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias: NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.: Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: Pass

Congratulations! (Only question is why is it called "kitefin"?)

Thanks! I have no idea why it's called the kitefin shark. -- Yzx (talk) 19:58, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mattisse (Talk) 19:29, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]