Jump to content

Talk:Labour for Independence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

This article contains very little actual information. There's nothing on numbers or activities of the organisation.

Even an explanation of the name of the organisation could be helpful. Is this Labour's voters, members, msps, or mps for independence?

The second paragraph on possible reasons for support for independence is well covered in other, much more notable, articles — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.152.83.56 (talk) 16:40, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Labour for Independence is now organised in 5 regional units - then lists 6 ... ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.188.14.204 (talk) 14:06, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The line about it being described as an "SNP front" is very misleading, as it doesn't actually mention it was described as such by LABOUR members, who obviously had a vested interest in describing it this way. 80.43.21.203 (talk) 15:32, 27 August 2015 (UTC)Lance Tyrell[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Labour for Independence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:02, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]