Talk:Love.Live.Life
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Semi-protected edit request on 28 June 2020
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= oder |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove Hip-pop and source and replace it with *Hip hop
- R&B[1] as Evening Standard is a tabloid and tabloids are not acceptable as reliable sources. 82.132.230.89 (talk) 09:54, 28 June 2020 (UTC) 82.132.230.89 (talk) 09:54, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Love.Live.Life. by N-Dubz". AnyDecentMusic. 29 November 2010. Retrieved 14 May 2010.
Erledigt! GoingBatty (talk) 15:46, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- @GoingBatty:@Aoi: I removed hip hop and R&B from the infobox because the source, AnyDecentMusic, is just a website that aggregates reviews, the sentence "Third album of hip-hop / R&B from the London-based trio" is just an introduction, not a professional review, and its author is unknown. I would point out that the previous source, Evening Standard, isn't considered unreliable, but "neither generally reliable nor generally unreliable" (WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:MREL). In my opinion it could be used for genres. Even AnyDecentMusic takes into account of Evening Standard in its aggregate scores[1]. I would add that Evening Standard is already used as source in "Critical reception" section, if we decide that it's unreliable we should also remove that content. Blueberry72 (talk) 19:22, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
