Jump to content

Talk:Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Outdated

[edit]

The hotel is no longer owned by Doug Manchester, so I don't see how information about the Prop 8 protests is still relevant. Athene cunicularia (talk) 06:31, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Manchester Grand Hyatt Hotel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:26, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Manchester Controversy

[edit]

The persistent obstruction of a section referencing the controversy surrounding the ownership of the hotel by Doug Manchester is questionable and requires review. Arguments made calling the entire controversy irrelevant because Doug Manchester no longer owns the hotel ignore the factual and historical position that acknowledges the protests as a catalyst for the sell-off and subsequent name change(s). The continued deletion of this section could possibly be a ruse by editors working on behalf of the interests of the Hyatt Corporation to distance themselves from the controversy. The controversy itself, though, consists of historical events (protests) and is relevant to the history of the property. Wikipedia is not an advertising platform for hotel chains and does not exempt them from the acknowledgment of controversy. I would appreciate it if an admin took a look at this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.228.46 (talkcontribs) 21:39, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]