Jump to content

Talk:Matthew Cradock

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleMatthew Cradock has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 4, 2011Good article nomineeListed

Untitled

[edit]

There is probably enough family history information out there to confirm that Cradock the merchant is not Matthew Cradock the mayor. With the references I have right now, it looks like "original research" to assert that, though. Charles Matthews (talk) 20:16, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Matthew Cradock/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:35, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I took a look through this article. Mostly it's good, though I found the following concerns:

  • "Craddock was twice married." should be Cradock here to make it consistent throughout article
  • "Interest by London merchants in establishing and managing colonial settlements in North America waned after the 1724 failure of the London Company" Either this is irrelevant due to it being so far into the future or that's supposed to say 1624.

Just these couple small issues: I'll put the article on hold and will pass it when the issues are fixed. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 04:35, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh duh. It was 1624 of course. I've also fixed the crad[d]ock spelling. Magic♪piano 13:23, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good now, so I'll pass the article as a GA. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:27, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Matthew Cradock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:24, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]