Jump to content

Talk:Menachem Genack

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Discussion about vote

[edit]

Not Important? What are you smoking? Read the article. An established newspaper consideres him one the 50 most influential Jews in the United States. If that does not make him important then what does? Besides, he is a CEO of a multi-million dollar company. Read the article befor you tag it! --Yeshivish 04:00, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should we make a list of important Pagans next? How about important Belgians? Nardman1 03:43, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Do you see a list anywhere? The point is (I can't believe I actually have to explain this) if a newspaper considers him one of the 50 most important Jews in the US, and there are a lot of jews (see Lists of Jews) in the US, then ipso facto he is important. And, one more time, he is a CEO of a multi-million dollar company.--Yeshivish 04:00, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, and I removed the speedy tag. BTW "Forward" is a famous and notable Jewish paper. Anyway, this guy deserves at least a chance in an WP:AFD, although I haven't sent it there. Herostratus 05:16, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Menachem Genack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:52, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]