Talk:Stockholm School of Economics in Riga

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Latvia Low‑importance

	Latvia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latvia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latvia related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatviaWikipedia:WikiProject LatviaTemplate:WikiProject LatviaLatvia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Hey, maybe it would be possible to provide the coordinates of this Augstskola? So that it would be possible to find it in, e.g. Google Earth? Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kazkaskazkasako (talk • contribs) 01:26, 2 October 2006

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result was merge here. -- Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 06:45, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am proposing that Investment Game be merged into this article, per WP:MERGE criteria 'text' and 'context'. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 05:27, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Four of us said Keep with only you saying merge in the recent AFD [1]. I found notable coverage for it. Enough information to fill its own article. Dream Focus 17:21, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And one of those 'keep's was explicitly open to the idea of a merger, with the close being "without prejudice" to a merge. Additionally, you have offered no counter to my merge rationales, beyond an assertion of notability (which, as acknowledged by the close, is not an impediment to merging, where good reasons for a merge have been presented). Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 21:50, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support The article in question contains information that would probably naturally fit and be better served in this article.--Yaksar (let's chat) 00:52, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.