Talk:The Way (TV series)

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force.

BBC

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

The "reception" section is written in a too personal style, with an exaggerated and biased use of quotes to corroborate the author's personal opinion of the negative reception. The inappropriate use of extrapolated quotes to support a thesis can easily manipulate the reader's perception. Fede Ren88 (talk) 09:24, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The section was actually a little too verbose and partial (I'm sure not intentionally), so I edited it into a more essential and neutral version. LilyLilac88 (talk) 14:21, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removing all but one negative review and keeping the one positive review is not "neutrality", but false balance (WP:PROPORTION) and will be seen as disruptive editing at best and vandalism at worst. Rambling Rambler (talk) 15:00, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Long sentence in Synopsis

Geoff attempts to convince Hogwood of their innocence and to let them go though the latter rebuffs the suggestion, admitting that while he knows the decision over who he's to target was made by an unaccountable black-box algorithmic system he'll follow the instructions he's been given nonetheless and gives the camp an ultimatum to hand over Owen or be razed to the ground.

That's 63 words in one sentence! I can't keep track, so I can't tell you what it says. Is there any way to break it up so it's readable? 2001:BB6:47ED:FA58:4921:EE71:A61C:E352 (talk) 16:33, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]