Talk:Vaginamuseum
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from de:Vaginamuseum was copied or moved into Vaginamuseum. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Note
[edit]Note to admin: twice deleted under Vaginamuseum. 331dot (talk) 21:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Dear all, I know my new article is still a stump. I created the English version of the German Wikipedia page "Vaginamuseum", because for some months, a British youtuber wrongly has been claiming she was the first worldwide to create a "vaginamuseum". In reality, this honour belongs to Kerstin Rajnar in Vienna. Please visit: www.vaginamuseum.at/home-en
We will enrich this article soon. Please don't delete it.
For notability, I can only give you press reviews in German: https://www.woman.at/a/vaginamuseum https://g24.at/Article563.html https://kurier.at/leben/jede-vagina-ist-so-unterschiedlich-wie-unsere-nasen-und-augen/70.829.045 https://www.l-mag.de/news-1010/viva-la-vulva.html http://www.jetzt.de/interview/vagina-und-penis-sind-nicht-pornografisch-587195
Best regards, --Myriam Thyes 21:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- SoWhy may be able to help cite the German sources and make the article stable, and Megalibrarygirl may be able to assist too. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:52, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
- (pinged) The sources above and what Megan found seem sufficient. There is also an interview with kurier.at and one at TheGap.at. I did move the article back to Vaginamuseum btw which is the WP:COMMONNAME per sources. Regards SoWhy 19:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
Contested deletion
[edit]This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because...
There is an article about the Icelandic Phallological Museum in the English language Wikipedia. I think it is only right to also mention the worldwide first Vagina Museum, even if it is not yet a physical museum but just a website, a travelling exhibition and a series of events. And there is the German language Wikipedia page https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaginamuseum , so this is one more reason.
Best regards, --Myriam Thyes 21:44, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Myriam Thyes: Hello. Other similar museums existing is not sufficient reason to have an article about this one, see other stuff exists. Each article is judged on its own merits. This article needs to indicate with independent reliable sources that give in depth coverage(not just press announcements) about the subject and indicate how it meets notability guidelines(either WP:ORG or WP:WEB). 331dot (talk) 22:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
How does X work?
[edit]{{Help me}}
Hello. A while ago i adapted the german Version of Vaginamuseum. Today I edited the english article. When i wanted to publish the article suddenly this came up: Fehler: Diese Aktion wurde automatisch als schädlich erkannt und deshalb nicht ausgeführt. Wenn du denkst, dass deine Aktion konstruktiv war, wende dich bitte an einen Administrator und schildere ihm, was du versucht hast beizutragen. Kurzbeschreibung der verletzten Regel: Vandalism in all caps. I did not do any vandalism, i just adapted the text, cleared the structure of the content, addeded sources and embedded images...Thank you for your help --Pinkerry (talk) 10:06, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- C-Class Internet culture articles
- Low-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- C-Class Museums articles
- Low-importance Museums articles
- C-Class Gender studies articles
- Low-importance Gender studies articles
- WikiProject Gender studies articles
- C-Class women's health articles
- Low-importance women's health articles
- WikiProject Women's Health articles