Jump to content

Talk:Wiegenlied, D 498 (Schubert)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested moves

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved as requested. bd2412 T 18:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

– I'm currently rather neutral on these page moves, but this is the direction the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical music#While we have your attention... "D" or "D."? seems to be heading. Just trying to make sure we won't have to move these pages again anywhere soon — and, when there's a consensus to move, I'll take it upon myself to update Wikipedia:Naming conventions (music)#Compositions (classical music) accordingly. Francis Schonken (talk) 21:23, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

[edit]
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
  • I think there are more pressing issues in the classical music section of Wikipedia than removing the dot after a catalogue abbreviation, something which is not universally seen. Also, making this request before the mentioned discussion has concluded seems to me to increase the risk of further moves. Ad rem: I think Deutsch numbers without a dot are a good thing, and to that extent I support the proposal. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:08, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I support the addition of the comma ("D major D" must look strange to someone who knows other meanings of "major", and I support the removal of the dot, as consistent with BWV and others. I would not need Schubert but won't fight for that. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:30, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support for consistency regarding use or omission of comma, and I agree with Gerda about "D major D". I think many readers will be helped by "(Schubert)", so strong support for this. --Stfg (talk) 14:47, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support the removal of the dot, to have the format in Wikipedia coincide with that set forth by authorities in Tübingen/Vienna - Neue Schubert-Ausgabe. And also support the addition of a comma before the listing of the Deustch number for added clarity in the title. Solti79 (talk) 17:52, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.