Template talk:Fossil cephalopods

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cephalopods, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CephalopodsWikipedia:WikiProject CephalopodsTemplate:WikiProject CephalopodsCephalopods articles

Palaeontology

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles

Nifty[edit]

A nifty addition overall, if I may say so. That being said I doubt it goes well with just any old cephalopod related article but it certainly makes a nice supplement to pages on higher (highest) taxa.

I hope nobody minds, but I edited the Mesozoic and Cambrian portions to put, what seems to me, better stratigraphic groupings.

I doubt that the Paleozoic sans Cambrian or the Mesozoic need to be further subdivided into periods ( it might appear too involved). I will be working on (unless someone beats me to it) putting Paleozoic forms (Ordovician and later) in a more logical, phylogenitic order.

See you in the deep blue J.H.McDonnell (talk) 22:06, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]