Peer review

Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects:

Lead

Guiding questions:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic?
Is the content added up-to-date?
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral?
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
Are the sources current?
Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
Are images well-captioned?
Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
What are the strengths of the content added?
How can the content added be improved?

Examples of good feedback

A good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.

Peer review of "Homemaking"
Peer review of this article about a famous painting

Additional Resources

Check out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions.

General info

Whose work are you reviewing?

User: Arjunverma 28

Link to draft you're reviewing
User:Arjunverma 28/Childhood
Link to the current version of the article (if it exists): Childhood

Evaluate the drafted changes

After reading the bibliography of this article, I saw here is a lot of things missing in outlines of proposed changes. Here is only references are given no contents related to references. Expand the outlines of this article changes like:

Outlines of proposed changes

Need to changes are given below :

What is childhood?

There are two forms of childhood definitions: biological and social.

A biological child is a boy or girl who is born to their parents naturally, without any medical assistance. This means that the child is genetically related to their mother and father. It is different from an adopted child, who becomes the son or daughter of a parent or parents through legal adoption. ^[1]

What Is Social Development in Early Childhood?

Social development in early childhood refers to the gradual process by which a child learns to interact with others, form relationships, and develop a sense of self in relation to others. During this stage, children learn important skills such as communication, empathy, cooperation, and conflict resolution. These skills help children understand their own emotions and those of others, build meaningful relationships, and navigate the social world around them. Social development in early childhood is crucial as it lays the foundation for future social, emotional, and cognitive development.^[2]

What are the stages of childhood?

Early childhood^[3]

Middle childhood^[4]

Late childhood^[5]

Five areas of development in early childhood

Middle childhood

Some common traits of middle childhood can be:

Thinking more about one’s future
Experiencing peer pressure and caring about what others think
Gaining independence
Thinking for oneself
Identifying and understanding emotions
Building friendships with peers
Wanting to belong and be accepted
Getting better at reading and other school subjects
Adjusting to school life and having a routine

Conclusion:

Overall, definition of childhood, stages of childhood, modern concepts of childhood, history of childhood with good examples, how childhood can influence people, healthy childhoods, age responsibility and many more which are tell readers about the article of childhood. After that this article will covered the all aspects.

Reference

"biological child definition · LSData" www.lsd.law. Retrieved 2024-03-25.
"Social development in early childhood and how it can affect your kids"www.unishanoi.org. Retrieved 2024-03-25.
"What is early childhood? - Center for High Impact Philanthropy"Center for High Impact Philanthropy - University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved 2024-03-25.
CDC (2021-02-04)"Child Development: Middle Childhood (6-8 years old) | CDC"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 2024-03-25.
"LATE CHILDHOOD"Developmental Milestones. Retrieved 2024-03-25.

^ "biological child definition · LSData". www.lsd.law. Retrieved 2024-03-25.
^ "Social development in early childhood and how it can affect your kids". www.unishanoi.org. Retrieved 2024-03-25.
^ "What is early childhood? - Center for High Impact Philanthropy". Center for High Impact Philanthropy - University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved 2024-03-25.
^ CDC (2021-02-04). "Child Development: Middle Childhood (6-8 years old) | CDC". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 2024-03-25.
^ "LATE CHILDHOOD". Developmental Milestones. Retrieved 2024-03-25.

[1] "biological child definition · LSData". www.lsd.law. Retrieved 2024-03-25.

[2] "Social development in early childhood and how it can affect your kids". www.unishanoi.org. Retrieved 2024-03-25.

[3] "What is early childhood? - Center for High Impact Philanthropy". Center for High Impact Philanthropy - University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved 2024-03-25.

[4] CDC (2021-02-04). "Child Development: Middle Childhood (6-8 years old) | CDC". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 2024-03-25.

[5] "LATE CHILDHOOD". Developmental Milestones. Retrieved 2024-03-25.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]