Jump to content

User:Boud/Draft:WikiProject Peace

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to WikiProject Peace. Several Wikipedians (have formed or are seeing if they can form (UPDATE!)) this collaboration resource and group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's theoretical and empirical coverage of peace processes and the organization of information and articles on this topic. This page and its subpages contain their suggestions and various resources; it is hoped that this project will help to focus the efforts of other Wikipedians interested in the topic. If you would like to help, please add yourself as a participant in the project, inquire on the talk page, and see the to-do list, below.

This will not be proposed as a formal WikiProject unless about 6 to 12 editors add their names and are clearly active in editing related pages and in communicating with one another as a cohesive editorial group :). The aim is to move this page (together with the talk page) to WP: space if a critical mass is found. 22:10, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Goals

[edit]

While military conflicts have got and continue to get, as of February 2022, huge amounts of academic and media attention, detailed theoretical and empirical coverage of peace processes gets much less attention, and correspondingly, much fewer and lower quality Wikipedia articles. The aim of this project is to improve the coverage of late XXth and early XXIst century research and other reliably sourced knowledge on these processes.

Scope

[edit]

As of February 2022, the Wikipedia article Peace is very broad, and has a huge amount of material on prizes, religious ideas of peace, beliefs, monuments, and only a small fraction covers XXth+XXIst century research and organisations involved concretely in confidence-building measures and other processes. While this project might want to consider debating the best structure for the particular article "Peace", the main focus should be on:

  • ?

Open tasks

[edit]

Groups of articles

[edit]

Individual articles

[edit]

Participants

[edit]

Primary contact(s): ?

Please feel free to add yourself here, and to indicate any areas of particular interest.

  1. Boud (talk) (I would very much like this project to be viable, but my contributions will be sporadic, without promises of sustained editing. A critical mass of editors would be needed for the project to be viable. I generally don't work articles up to Featured articles status; other people would need to do that.) 22:06, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
  2. Bookku (talk) Though my participation in directly related topics will be limited, Still since I promote articles/ drafts on topics having information or knowledge gap following drafts seem to be indirectly important for peace related discussions IMHO. So requesting article expansion help in Draft:Civil life in conflict zones and Draft:Women, conflict and conflict zones. I also suppose researching and discussing including criticizing Bias in curricula (also media drama movies preaching) then hate speech in each and every country and religious schools and institutions can ultimately benefit peace processes.I also do recommend topic of Logic. 13 February 2022
  3. 511KeV (talk · contribs) (This Wikiproject can prove helpful in bridging the gap under the white flag. I will be pleased to carry one.) 13:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
  4. Thriley (talk) (Would be happy to create start class articles and expand current ones.) 04:38, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
  5. XTheBedrockX (talk) (Happy to contribute to articles that analyze peace negotiations and their outcomes. I can't guarantee I'll always be active, but if a topic interests me, I'll probably contribute to it) 23:31, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Articles

[edit]
[edit]

Candidates

[edit]

New articles

[edit]

Please feel free to list your new Peace-process-related articles here (newer articles at the top, please). Any new articles that have an interesting or unusual fact in them, are at least over 1,500 characters, don't have any dispute templates on them, and cite their sources, should be suggested for the Did you know? box on the Wikipedia Main Page.

Currently eligible for DYK

[edit]
  • ...

Nominated for DYK

[edit]
  • ...

ITN (In the news)

[edit]

Recently created/expanded, but not DYK eligible

[edit]
  • ...

Review and assessment

[edit]

Assessment

[edit]
Assessment

Peer review

[edit]
Peer review

Statistics

[edit]

Categories

[edit]

Templates

[edit]

Resources

[edit]
[edit]


[edit]