User talk:23.154.136.104

August 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to November 2015 Paris attacks have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: November 2015 Paris attacks was changed by 23.154.136.104 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951778 on 2023-08-25T04:13:04+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:13, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Affowler. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Bbb23 (talk) 00:38, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Frank DeArmon Whitney, you may be blocked from editing. Bbb23 (talk) 02:47, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It’s all reliable sources it’s a big matter he has photos with the confederate flag and he apologised. How can a federal judge be associated with the confederate flags and ignore this matter 23.154.136.104 (talk) 02:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1]https://news.yahoo.com/us-judge-lawyers-sorry-1980s-confederate-flag-photos-172725851.html 23.154.136.104 (talk) 02:55, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Frank DeArmon Whitney shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 02:55, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly! I grasp the situation. How can we collaborate on refining the text to reach a consensus? Your assistance is highly valued, given your extensive expertise in this field. Thank you. 23.154.136.104 (talk) 03:02, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to mention in his wiki page that the judge expressed regret for being photographed with the Confederate flag, as indicated in the Yahoo News reference. Additionally, there's an ongoing petition against him with thousands of signatures. It's important for others to be aware of his remorse regarding his association with the group that displayed the flag. 2607:FB91:28:F67:D96B:9395:43E3:C03E (talk) 03:14, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree how can we do that 23.154.136.104 (talk) 03:16, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:23.154.136.104 reported by User:Bbb23 (Result: ). Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 13:06, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.