Jump to content

User talk:49.198.7.235

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Citobun is completely wrong

[edit]

Citobun does not know what he's talking about as he is trying to glorify and protect someone who has been accused of traffic crimes for the sake of advancing his own political agendas: namely to bash China. Your edits and additional citations were actually helpful, and try not to listen to uneducated trolls like him.

suggestions

[edit]

You can remove Citobun's smear campaigning from your talk page by editing the source of your talk page. I can help you protect the Gui Minhai page from his abusive reverts.

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi 49.198.7.235! You created a thread called broke the page at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Your submission at Articles for creation: Hervé Ghesquière (August 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 20:39, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 49.198.7.235! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:39, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi 49.198.7.235! You created a thread called 1987 Mecca incident#Demonstrations at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hervé Ghesquière, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Automatic train protection for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Automatic train protection is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Automatic train protection until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. YorkshireLad (talk) 21:42, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hervé Ghesquière (May 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 06:09, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hervé Ghesquière has been accepted

[edit]
Hervé Ghesquière, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 05:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]