User talk:Alikima

February 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm ThaddeusSholto. I noticed that you recently removed content from Racism in Asia without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 16:10, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ThaddeusSholto No. I accessed the link linked to the content but due to the network it didn't work so I thought allegations were groundless but when I searched for a while, I noticed it was my computer issue. I didn't remove the content Alikima (talk) 16:13, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you did and you claimed they were "false" while doing so. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 16:15, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ThaddeusSholto Aaron you sure? I remember changing Alikima (talk) 16:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just linked to the edit itself. Yes, I'm sure. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 16:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You also delete sourced content in other articles simply because you disagree with it [1], [2]. This is disruptive and you need to discuss changes of this magnitude on the article talk pages. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 16:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ThaddeusSholto It was which page... I wanna check and see how I can ameliorate. I'm sorry really. I forgot but I normally make sure the encyclopedia is factual and made of no one-sided content Alikima (talk) 16:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Mail-order bride, you may be blocked from editing. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 16:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ThaddeusSholto Hey ThaddeusSholto, I removed data regarding some countries as it seems the data itself is contradictory. For instance, they claims bribes from Vietnam go to China but contradicted themselves with South Asia and Southeast Asia Alikima (talk) 16:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No you removed sourced content. If you take issue with something that is heavily referenced, then use the article talk page. Stop deleting content you don't like to push your own POV. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 16:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ThaddeusSholto Ok Thad but i think even with reference, many articles on this encyclopedia are to be corrected (of course with factual reasons). But there are articles that don't match the reference content. We're here to be a factual-based encyclopedia. Thanks for reminding me Alikima (talk) 16:59, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:V. Articles must have verifiable reliable sources. You haven't added a single source, you just delete things you don't like. That isn't how Wikipedia works. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 17:01, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Mail-order bride. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 16:53, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 01:25, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill ??? Alikima (talk) 01:28, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]