User talk:Cricky2023

May 2023

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bluestone Group have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 16:50, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion. Arjayay! My goal is to contribute more for the wikipedia and your help will be appreciated. Cricky2023 (talk) 10:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Daudnagar, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. -Asheiou (they/them • talk) 15:03, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I sincerely appreciate your valuable guidance. I apologize for overlooking the Wikipedia link, and I have promptly removed it. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. Cricky2023 (talk) 15:09, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dhruv edits. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bihar Legislative Assembly have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Dhruv edits (talk) 11:49, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Jim Brown has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 19:08, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NexInfo Solutions (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Loksmythe were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NexInfo Solutions and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Loksmythe (talk) 03:14, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cricky2023! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Loksmythe (talk) 03:14, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 19:15, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Team

As suggested by Yamla to read article on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest and

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion

I found these two articles very useful, as they say, "If editors choose to add material to an article on behalf of a COI or paid editor, they must provide attribution for the text in the edit summary. The edit summary should include the name of the COI or paid editor, a link to the draft or edit request, and that the edit contains a COI or paid contribution. For example: "Text inserted on behalf of paid editor User:X; copied from Draft:Paid draft." This transparency helps editors and readers to determine the extent of COI influence on the article. It also complies with copyright requirements.

"Advertising, marketing or public relations. Information about companies and products must be written in an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery. All article topics must be verifiable with independent, third-party sources, so articles about very small garage bands or local companies are typically unacceptable. Wikipedia articles about a person, company, or organization are not an extension of their website, press releases, or other social media marketing efforts. External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify notable organizations wthatare the topic of the article. Wikipedia neither endorses organizations nor runs affiliate programs. See also Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) for guidelines on corporate notability. Those promoting causes or events, or issuing public service announcements, even if noncommercial, should use a forum other than Wikipedia to do so. Contributors must disclose any payments they receive for editing Wikipedia. See also Wikipedia:Conflict of iInterest:Paid eEiting."

I still feel I can learn Wikipedia better, and your articles are improving me. Now i can ask for unblocking, and I want to assure you that I have an interest in Wikipedia's improvement. I have been reading Wikipedia since childhood and utilizing its free content, and now I am ready to spend 1 hour on Wikipedia to improve it. Cricky2023 (talk) 11:15, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cricky2023 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am writing to express my deepest apologies for the disruptive edits I made on Wikipedia and to kindly request the unblocking of my account. I realize now the gravity of my actions and the negative impact they have had on the integrity and reliability of the platform.

First and foremost, I want to assure you that my intentions were never malicious or intended to harm the Wikipedia community. However, I made a series of hasty decisions and ill-informed contributions that I deeply regret. In my pursuit of contributing to the collective knowledge base, I failed to adhere to the guidelines, policies, and spirit of collaboration that make Wikipedia a truly remarkable resource. I now realize that my disruptive edits were counterproductive and undermined the hard work and dedication of the volunteers who tirelessly strive to maintain the integrity of this invaluable platform. I kindly request your forgiveness and the opportunity to have my account unblocked. I understand that regaining your trust will take time and effort on my part, but I am committed to proving that I can be a responsible contributor and a valuable member of the Wikipedia community. I am eager to make amends and contribute positively to this remarkable platform. Cricky2023 (talk) 05:39, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm feeling like you might have written this request with a bot- if you did, please don't going forward. We want to hear from you, not a bot- if you didn't, please use fewer adjectives in your sentences. We don't need to know how great Wikipedia is. Your edits were poorly done, and in addition seem to suggest a connection to NexInfo Solutions where you violated WP:COI and WP:PAID. Please disclose your connection to that company and tell us what edits you intend to make going forward. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:13, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cricky2023 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Admin, I am working for Nexinfo Solutions and tried to create a page for the company. I read your guidelines and policy before submitting. I tried making the changes suggested by Wikipedia in my profile, and i became confident about creating a page, but it was rejected based on neutrality content. As our company is a premier partner of Oracle, I thought it must have a page. But it has been blocked because I edited Jim Brown's page.

Decline reason:

We are not interested in what Nexinfo Solutions wishes to say about itself. See WP:COI and WP:PROMO. If this is your only goal here, this is the end of the line. Yamla (talk) 10:54, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cricky2023 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As suggested by Yamla to read article on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest and :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion :I found these two articles very useful, as they say, "If editors choose to add material to an article on behalf of a COI or paid editor, they must provide attribution for the text in the edit summary. The edit summary should include the name of the COI or paid editor, a link to the draft or edit request, and that the edit contains a COI or paid contribution. For example: "Text inserted on behalf of paid editor User:X; copied from Draft:Paid draft." This transparency helps editors and readers to determine the extent of COI influence on the article. It also complies with copyright requirements. :"Advertising, marketing or public relations. Information about companies and products must be written in an objective and unbiased style, free of puffery. All article topics must be verifiable with independent, third-party sources, so articles about very small garage bands or local companies are typically unacceptable. Wikipedia articles about a person, company, or organization are not an extension of their website, press releases, or other social media marketing efforts. External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify notable organizations wthatare the topic of the article. Wikipedia neither endorses organizations nor runs affiliate programs. See also Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) for guidelines on corporate notability. Those promoting causes or events, or issuing public service announcements, even if noncommercial, should use a forum other than Wikipedia to do so. Contributors must disclose any payments they receive for editing Wikipedia. See also Wikipedia:Conflict of iInterest:Paid eEiting." :I still feel I can learn Wikipedia better, and your articles are improving me. Now i can ask for unblocking, and I want to assure you that I have an interest in Wikipedia's improvement. I have been reading Wikipedia since childhood and utilizing its free content, and now I am ready to spend 1 hour on Wikipedia to improve it.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:01, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:NexInfo Solutions

Hello, Cricky2023. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:NexInfo Solutions, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:NexInfo Solutions

Hello, Cricky2023. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "NexInfo Solutions".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:18, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]