User talk:DeliSubs

Welcome!

Hello, DeliSubs, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Muggsy Bogues did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Aoi (青い) (talk) 21:51, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please stop making unsourced changes to biographies. - Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 21:58, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is from Google, don’t blame me. If you have a problem, come at me DeliSubs (talk) 22:05, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Chet Holmgren, you may be blocked from editing. —Bagumba (talk) 22:07, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Jalen Williams, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically per MOS:SENTENCECAPS, Wikipedia uses sentence capitalization, not title. —Bagumba (talk) 22:13, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued unsourced edits and capitalization again the WP:MOS.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Bagumba (talk) 04:51, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell is wrong with capitalizing things? It's just to make things more formal, are you restarted and accoustic? What a dumbo, get lost or come at me! DeliSubs (talk) 05:05, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(redacted) DeliSubs (talk) 05:09, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DeliSubs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm only capitalizing things because I want to make the information/details seem prominent. Furthermore, I'm not posting incorrect information because I'm getting it from either Google or NBA stats. Please reconsider your foolish actions and think before you blame me for nothing that I've done wrongfully. If you continue to do these foolish acts and waste my personal time, I have my rights to contact Wikipedia to fire you and sue their company. Anyhow, don't try me nor act superior than me. Thanks for understanding. DeliSubs (talk) 05:15, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You've made this worse by making personal attacks and a legal threat so you will now lose talk page access. 331dot (talk) 08:06, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock discussion

I just fix unblocks these days, but I think this edit merits loss of TPA -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:36, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

331dot (talk) 08:06, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]