Jump to content

User talk:Eio-cos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Eio-cos, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Eio-cos! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ben Sira, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Euergetes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mochica culture

[edit]

Hello Eio-cos,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mochica culture for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jhona43 (talk) 16:41, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Matter resolved. Eio-cos (talk) 14:26, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Moosehadley. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Monte Alto culture— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Moosehadley 02:29, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK, Moosehadley, this edit was no big deal. I just thought it a good idea to provide some more info about the link, but if you don't like it, that's fine. Eio-cos (talk) 02:44, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Eio-cos. You have new messages at Moosehadley's talk page.
Message added 03:02, 28 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Moosehadley 03:02, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The matter was all taken care of. Eio-cos (talk) 14:11, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mokaya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cacao. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrate

[edit]
Clownscloudsblahblah Yoor Know Phool
Have a humorous day filled with lots of PHUN on this April Fools Day 2015. Any annoyance is purely coincidental.   Bfpage |leave a message  21:16, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quatrefoil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mayan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing style on Potbelly sculpture

[edit]

Hi Eio-cos. I notice you reverted my formatting on Potbelly sculpture. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources, specifically the WP:CITEVAR subsection: Each article should use the same citation method throughout; if an article already has citations, adopt the method in use or seek consensus on the talk page before changing it. Best regards, Simon Burchell (talk) 07:52, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miller and Taube

[edit]

Please look at my new section in the talk page for the Mesoamerican calendars article. Senor Cuete (talk) 19:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kotosh Religious Tradition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puna. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Caballo Muerto
added a link pointing to Chavin
Pampa Grande
added a link pointing to Chavin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lovelock Cave
added a link pointing to Pyramid Lake
Spirit Cave mummy
added a link pointing to Pyramid Lake

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Fallon, Nevada into Grimes Point. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:47, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BP

[edit]

Hi - just wondering, when you say "going back to 20,000 BP" I think we need a source and one using BP. BP dates aren't calendar dates and can often confuse readers who think that they are. Of course they may be calibrated and we can say that if they are. Doug Weller talk 10:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot the link.[1] And following one of the wikilinks I see a source with a title saying something about 22,000 which at Toca da Tira Peia uses a source using 22,000 as calendar years. Our article on the Pedra Furada sites has a mixture of calendar and BP dates. Doug Weller talk 10:14, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your interest, Doug. Yes, I agree that we should distinguish between these dates more clearly. I've already added 'cal BP' there. It seems that 'cal BP' years are generally 1,000 to 2,000 years older than uncalibrated. Plus the confusion between BC and BP that is also possible. So these differences can all add up and confuse people. Most of the time I just copy some of these dates from article abstracts, where the details are sometimes unspecified. Eio-cos (talk) 15:36, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Great, muuch appreciated. We should only use BP where the sources use it. Doug Weller talk 09:14, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luzia Woman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pedra Furada. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marañón River

[edit]

could you please supply references to the stuff you added on Marañón River?--Wuerzele (talk) 23:38, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wuerzele. The stuff that I added is basically a general update with links. The links do have refs in them. So, to help things along, would you please place some 'citation needed' tags where you think some specific refs are needed? Then I'll take it from there. Eio-cos (talk) 18:38, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A critical second set of eyes is always good...

[edit]

Hey Eio-cos, check my new article Muisca mummification. This is the kind of level I want to live up to; lots of references, external links to check out and organised. Tell me what you think of it. Cheers, Tisquesusa (talk) 03:19, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Torihama shell mound, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mustard. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add quotations

[edit]

Please don't add quotations unless absolutely necessary. To do so violates our non-free content policy. Everything you add to this wiki should be written in your own words please. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:13, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It would be helpful if you pointed to some specific instances where in your opinion my quotes were inappropriate. I do try to use quotations only when absolutely necessary. Eio-cos (talk) 15:03, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It was on the article Japanese lacquerware. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Diannaa, I replaced the info and refs that you deleted. Eio-cos (talk) 21:11, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New Andean preceramic article!

[edit]

Hey Eio-cos, you may be interested in reading my latest Andean preceramic article; Aguazuque, close to the earlier described Tequendama. Good luck with the Japanese archaeology! Cheers, Tisquesusa (talk) 22:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eio-cos, the article I was talking about has been published: Muisca art. When you have some time left, could you give it a critical review? Thanks and good luck with the Chinchorro! Cheers, Tisquesusa (talk) 20:21, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chinchorro culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Typology. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Amacuzac River

[edit]

Hello, my name is Diego Alberto Rivera and I am a student from the Tecnologico de Monterrey Campus Ciudad de Mexico and I´ve been working in an article about the Amacuac River. I would like to know your opinion about it and if you could correct minor errors. Thank you for your attention and I hope to hear from you. Here is a link to the workspace where the article iS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Thelmadatter/Amacuzac_River. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rivera0997 (talkcontribs) 17:45, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Eio-cos. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gold Plating / "In ancient America"

[edit]

Hello, I just wanted you to know that I removed the section "In ancient America" in the Gold Plating article, which you originally wrote. I did so because the article claims to be about modern gold plating specifically, whereas Gilding addresses ancient techniques, and in fact mentions the technique used in Mesoamerica already. However, the second paragraph about the tumbaga work of Moche metalworkers doesn't seem relevant to the articles at all. Since it seemed pretty well sourced I thought I'd mention this in case you wanted to put it somewhere else. 96.41.225.223 (talk) 16:31, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FAR for Norte Chico

[edit]

I have nominated Norte Chico civilization for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. (t · c) buidhe 04:27, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]