Jump to content

User talk:Former user 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

L. Ron Hubbard is dead, so can you honestly prove that I am not Tom Cruise? Produce your proof if you can. Otherwise, my edits to this Wikipedia will stand as unbreakable law.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fire Star 1 July 2005 20:48 (UTC)

Your account has been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism. Fire Star 1 July 2005 20:51 (UTC)


Your account has been permanently blocked from editing for vandalism. Fuzheado | Talk 3 July 2005 15:25 (UTC)


Well, he was a busy little vandal, wasn't he? 314 article edits, going back a month and a half, and a whole lot of hoax articles. Looks like the earlier edits were constructive, though. Not sure when he went bad.

I've checked back to 3 July, the latest Sailor Galaxia edit. Help would be appreciated. Please update this to avoid duplication of effort. Thanks, Tualha 6 July 2005 14:55 (UTC)

He's blocked? Hurray! I find his/her edit on all the Sailor scouts' Japanese names dumb. All the description he/she made are not what Japanese speakers would think (like saying no means field, the fact being that no is intentionally used to mean of the). I plan to revert them all.--218.191.131.92 19:50, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ummm.... no (野) 'does' mean field when you write their names in kana it sound exactly like the connective partical (の) but it means field. Their names are puns they don't literally mean rabbit of the moon e.t.c.

He removed the homosexual reference from the Michiru Kaioh page, which doesn't seem reverted yet. It was done as part of one of the "constructive" edits. Ken Arromdee 07:09, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh. I know this guy in real life; I knew he was one of those Internet know-it-alls, but I never imagined he'd do something like this. Anyway, I reverted all the Sailor Moon pages he edited that others overlooked. It was too difficult to extract the relevant info from the speculative B.S., so it's better to start again. Danny Lilithborne 05:32, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]