User talk:Harrysstoller
Hi ! I see you has write the cast of Alpha and Omega 2. Since two month, I delete this because we have no source about this cast. Imdb is not a reliable source (IMDB write that Anthony Bell is the director of movie then it's not true). Please, stop to add information who are not sourced. Excuse me for my English, I'm French. Cordially. Supporterhéninois (talk) 08:59, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
November 2014
[edit] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Family Guy. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Davejohnsan (talk) 02:35, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
My Girl 2
[edit]Her father, Harry (Dan Aykroyd), has married Shelly DeVoto (Jamie Lee Curtis), and they are expecting a baby.
Her father, Harry (Dan Aykroyd), has remarried Shelly DeVoto (Jamie Lee Curtis), and they are expecting a baby.
Please read both of the above sentences carefully. Each has a different meaning, and one of them is clearly wrong in the context of the film (the one which says "remarried", which is how you edited the sentence in the film's plot). For Harry to have remarried Shelly, they would have needed to be married before to each other, which is not the case; each was married to another person. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:52, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
The Brady Bunch
[edit]Regarding two recent edits, [1] and [2], you are modifying the text to say fifth final season. The way the text has read, final season, is perfectly fine. If it read fifth season, that's perfectly fine. Even if it read fifth and final season, that's ok. But the way you are editing it is suggesting the show had more than one final season, which is illogical. Or are you saying that the entire show's run is a final season, and had five parts? In any case, saying "fifth final season" makes no sense at all. And regarding the change to the name of the DVD, that should be left alone (although I have seen it online as "The Complete Fifth Season" or "The Complete Final Season", but will go with the title that was there before; "The Complete Fifth Final Season" is not acceptable). Will not formally warn you this time, but because you have made this edit twice now, there will be a warning next time you make the same edit. MPFitz1968 (talk) 07:40, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
March 2015
[edit] Hello, I'm SummerPhD. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Alpha and Omega 2: A Howl-iday Adventure, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 23:19, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
May 2015
[edit] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wolf Children, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 00:12, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
July 2015
[edit] Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Little Mermaid: Ariel's Beginning, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AD (talk) 22:16, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
August 2015
[edit] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Little Mermaid: Ariel's Beginning. Diffs: [3] You need to discuss these changes on the article's talk pages instead of submitting them over and over. Also, this looks a lot to me like you were editing while logged out. Please don't do that. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:36, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
September 2015
[edit] Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
- User contributions
- Recent changes
- Watchlists
- Revision differences
- IRC channels
- Related changes
- New pages list and
- Article editing history
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Trivialist (talk) 00:45, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
October 2015
[edit] Hello, I'm Cannolis. Your recent edit to the page Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cannolis (talk) 19:51, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
December 2015
[edit] Hello, I'm ATinySliver. Thank you for your contributions. Your edits to Talk:Matthew Garber and Talk:Robert Oliveri were removed per WP:TALK because they did not appear to discuss improvements to the articles. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 🖖ATinySliver/ATalkPage 03:15, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Notification about disabling the Wikipedia collections tool
[edit]Thank you for using the collections feature in Wikipedia beta! Due to technical and moderation issues, we will be turning off this experimental feature. Your collections will be available for viewing and export until March 1st. If you would like to save your collection as links on a special Wikipedia page, please fill out the following form. If you are interested in giving your feedback about Wikipedia Collections please do so here.
Thanks,
Jon Katz
Product manager, Wikimedia Foundation
Jkatz (WMF) (talk) 23:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Harrysstoller. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Learn to Read, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Johnson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Harrysstoller. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Don't Eat the Pictures, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Harrysstoller. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Problem with your custom signature
[edit]You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.
The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.
The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.
- Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
- Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
- Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
- Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
- Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
- Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
- Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
- Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
- Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.
More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you. 18:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)