User talk:KingVik Planet
KingVik Planet, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]![]() |
Hi KingVik Planet! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 15 October 2018 (UTC) |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Legal framework for environmental protection in Rwanda, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:
- Copying text from other sources
- Policy on copyright
- Frequently asked questions on Wikipedia's copyright policy
- Policy and guideline on non-free content
If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.
- Einführung
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 20:38, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, @Diannaa for this tips, messagesand warm welcome, It feels great
- thank you for the information shared, I am gradually developing confidence and I am sure i will create and make better impacts
- KingVik Planet (talk) 09:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Community Based Approaches to Sustainable Land Use in Rwanda for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community Based Approaches to Sustainable Land Use in Rwanda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 12:48, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Dear @Chaotic Enby, I would love if you could provide me more information on why this article is marked for deletion
- this will help me to understand what is the problem and learn, waiting for your feedback
- KingVik Planet (talk) 12:54, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, the article appears to be more of an essay than an encyclopedia article, and reads like it is building a case to demonstrate the importance of a particular approach. A more encyclopedic way to go at it would be to write an article about the general topic itself (Land use in Rwanda) reflecting how it is treated in the sources. It's a good thing that you already compiled a lot of sources on the topic, and I wish you luck if you want to rewrite it to be more encyclopedic in scope. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 13:18, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Chaotic Enby, Thank you so much for your swift feedback, I really appreciate your feedback. Honestly, I want to learn more, I love research and writing, but I need guidance. Marking my article for deletion is not discouraging me, I need to be mentored because I feel like I am yet to develop confidence in contributing to Wikipedia, but I would love to keep making contributions, and I know I need time to learn
- I will conduct research to better understand the differences between essays and encyclopedia articles. I would love to i am guided properly to fixing the article instead of deletion as I will learn and then modify it to get it right.
- I am open to learning and to make contributions
- KingVik Planet (talk) 15:10, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot, I am always happy to see enthusiastic new editors! There are actually mentorship programs (Wikipedia:Adopt-a-user and Wikipedia:Growth Team features) if you want to take a look at them! Regarding the deletion, it is an opportunity to learn, and I think re-scoping the article on the general topic would likely help avoiding deletion, and you can write it with the sources you have already found, if that works for you? Good luck either way! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:25, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, the article appears to be more of an essay than an encyclopedia article, and reads like it is building a case to demonstrate the importance of a particular approach. A more encyclopedic way to go at it would be to write an article about the general topic itself (Land use in Rwanda) reflecting how it is treated in the sources. It's a good thing that you already compiled a lot of sources on the topic, and I wish you luck if you want to rewrite it to be more encyclopedic in scope. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 13:18, 12 July 2024 (UTC)