User talk:NetaKrakover

November 2023

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, your own website, websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight, expressing views that are widely acknowledged as extremist, that are promotional in nature, or that rely heavily on rumors and personal opinions, as one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 18:15, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! Will do. NetaKrakover (talk) 22:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Did you read the above message? This [1] is more of the same. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 05:43, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Of course I have. In this page, there were examples of ideas people came up with for bullet journals. I looked at other resources on the page and most of them were other blogs as well - which makes sense - since those will be where you publish such examples. I wonder what kind of example can be shown that is not a blog in this context (Of course a blog is not a reliable source for information, but a blog that shows an example of a usage can be?) NetaKrakover (talk) 04:42, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Don't use blog sourcing. If you notice a blog being used as a source, that is a problem to be fixed, not a reason to make the problem worse by adding even more blogs. MrOllie (talk) 12:34, 1 December 2023 (UTC)