Jump to content

User talk:PRL42

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Messages go here:

Your question

[edit]

My apologies my time online is limited at the moment. I hit a wrong key in my edit summary. The section to read is WP:COI. IF you have any further questions I can recommend that you try at the help desk if they don't have an answer I suspect that they will be able to direct you to a place that does. MarnetteD | Talk 19:40, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence, "a number of Annii during the Republic bore no cognomen" does not appear to need commas surrounding the phrase, "during the Republic." I admit a certain hesitancy with respect to the technical reasons for comma placement or the lack thereof, as I work chiefly by instinct and experience in this area. But I believe the applicable principle is that in this sentence, "during the Republic" is a restrictive clause that supplies essential detail to the preceding phrase, "a number of Annii." It is not a non-restrictive clause, and does not supply non-essential or parenthetical information to the sentence. I can see no reason why one would pause before and after the phrase. Having seen your work in other articles, I thought I would ask you to have another look. P Aculeius (talk) 13:40, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Policy page edit

[edit]

FYI, I've removed your text and placed it on the talk page. It wasn't immediately apparent that this was suitable for the lead paragraphs, so I've placed it up for discussion. (Please don't take it as a rejection of your idea; however, note that policy pages are often edited carefully and with much review due to their core importance to the project.) Cheers. --Ckatzchatspy 06:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recently added comment

[edit]

You recently added a comment at the wp:verifiabiity talk page under the "support" section for the proposal. It was not clear whether you intended this to be only a response to the previous comment or also a listing under support. Could you clarify? Thanks. North8000 (talk) 10:33, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Grace Fortescue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link to Kill
John J. Lentz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link to Founder

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]
Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! serioushat 08:29, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Honesty box (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Cash box and Unmanned
Yanbu International School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Gymnasium and Catalog
Optical power meter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Circuit

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Stacie Monroe

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Stacie Monroe, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. SaveATreeEatAVegan 22:47, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Hydrophis fasciatus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maxillary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

[edit]

Peter Loader (talk) 12:10, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:List of Midsomer Murders episodes, is considered bad practice, even if you meant it well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Peter Loader (talk) 12:10, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LOL. That was a mistake. I forgot I was reading a talk page until about 1 microsecond after pressing send. I did consider undoing the edit but as the stupidity would have remained in the history I didn't bother. PRL42 (talk) 12:27, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mitt Romney's backside

[edit]

These edits interject unnecessary and immature political opinion/criticism in an apolitical list. This no better than the old edits that called Stephen Hawking a "dirty lying cripple." There are better examples to portray the term that are more neutral and reliable. This is an op-ed commentary-- opinions aren't facts and the materials are not encyclopaedic. Regardless of political sentiment, the content borders on vandalism, and violates WP:NPOV and WP:SOAPBOX. Continue to add or re-add this violative material, and I will bring it to the attention of higher-ups for appropriate action.--ColonelHenry (talk) 13:11, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

787 delays

[edit]

The fleet being grounded today isn't related to the delay of entry into service. The latter suffered delays, but did happen. Gronky (talk) 23:50, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Catherine Tate Show, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matthew Horne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:30, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, PRL42. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, PRL42. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, PRL42. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tristan Farnon (character) moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Tristan Farnon (character), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 14:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tristan Farnon (character) moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Tristan Farnon (character), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 18:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PRL42. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tristan Farnon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:36, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Beautiful Minds (TV programme) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV, tagged for notability since 2018

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:44, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]