User talk:Panabol

Welcome!

Hello, Panabol, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

As you seem to be interested in the history of southern Thailand we probably will meet in editing sometimes, as it is also one of my favourite fields. However I am limited to english sources of these topics, which are rather limited, my Thai is still far from being able to read Thai books. Here are some interesting links, in case you haven't found them yet: Portal:Thailand and the Wikipedia:Thailand-related topics notice board. Hope you will enjoy your editing here and contribute a lot of knowledge difficult to access otherwise. andy 21:25, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lavo[edit]

The Lavo article is really good, but I think maybe it'd be better moved to History of Lopburi, which then could be referenced by putting something like

at the top of the history sections of Lopburi Province, Amphoe Mueang Lopburi and thesaban mueang Lopburi article. I also tried to copyedit the article to improve its English (which is probably still not perfect as I am also not a native speaker) and make it more clear for non-Thai readers. Yet I cannot fully understand what that King Kakabatr actually did - did he just introduce the Chulasakarat year counting to Lavo? Or start a new dynasty of Tai rulers of Lavo? andy 21:06, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply:
Many thanks to your help. I'm just an amateur who try to improve the Thai history knowledge for any foreigners. Beside I'm really not familiar to the system.
Some explanations base on Thai knowledge background so every requests should be reponse soon.
Panabol 07:35, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion[edit]

Hey, I quite like what you did in the History of Thailand, adding all the Pre-Sukhothai Kingdoms. I totally agree with what you are doing, as Thai history has been grossly simplified in the old article. Anyhow, I would like to suggest that the name of the article should perhaps be Pre-historic and Ancient kingdoms of Siam, rather than Intial states of Thailand. Banchiang for example would be considered as Pre-historic and anything else before Sukhothai (all the Indianised states) should be considered as part of the Ancient period (of Thai history). Devraj Singh 06:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thanks for your helpful suggestions. I've just finished the Prehistoric Thailand. However I'd like to keep the name "Initial states of Thailand" rather than "Ancient Kingdoms of Thailand". Because no scholars assert the political policy of those states are just the small states compare to ancient Indian states before King Ashoka era or as the kingdom of his period and other kingdoms after, by following the Chakravardiraj or Chakravardiwatra concept. Pana 09:56, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

From rank amateur[edit]

An anonymous source sent me an article on scholar Srisakra Vallibhotama. Searching his name led me to you, via the article where you cite him. I'm a farang in Yasothon & have initated only one, very amateurish page: Wat_Phra_That_Phanom last modified 09:36, 10 September 2007. Didn't even get the name right: should have bee Chedi Phra That Phanom. I've also contributed (no doubt serious errors) to Thai_lunar_calendar last modified 06:21, 27 June 2007 Thai_solar_calendar last modified 06:06, 31 July 2007 Yasothon last modified 21:07, 13 September 2007

Rocket_Festival

intro

Yasothon's Festival

Bang Fai (the rockets)

The Underlying Myth

Phadaeng, Nang Ai and Phangkhi

last modified 01:28, 5 September 2007

Haw_wars last modified 15:23, 26 July 2007:last paragraph Sato_(rice_wine):Little Brown Jug of Renuu

Should I quit posting for a couple of years until I've read some sources? Pawyilee 09:36, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]