Jump to content

User talk:Para.leaf

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Brazilian chart at mariah-charts.com is not the Crowley chart, it's from hot100brasil.com, which is listed at WP:BADCHARTS. The Portugal Singles Chart at acharts.us is also listed at WP:BADCHARTS. Please don't include these charts, or any other charts listed at WP:BADCHARTS in any Wikipedia articles.—Kww(talk) 15:44, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also: never fake a reference, as you did here. Only put in a reference to a magazine if you yourself have seen the magazine and verified the information.—Kww(talk) 15:46, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Paramore discography. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - eo (talk) 21:20, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

please stop reverting edits and placing unsourced/fake sources into articles

[edit]

Here [1] and here [2].

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Article, you may be blocked from editing. - eo (talk) 21:27, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning, reverting and fake sources

[edit]
  • Source does not back up your claim: [3]
  • You've again reverted this article without discussion. [4]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - eo (talk) 21:38, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit reverted

[edit]

You've inflated an album certification here [5], adding a non-English-language source that conflicts with the source which comes from the official organization that awards UK certifications (BPI, website shown right next to the one you added). The album is still certified Gold. [6] - eo (talk) 13:25, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Theonlyexceptionglee.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Theonlyexceptionglee.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 02:26, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

[edit]

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. Yves (talk) 22:18, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

[edit]

Hi there. When adding to Wikipedia, please back your information with legitimate sources; your addition here is not an example of this. Thank you. Yves (talk) 22:21, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Paramore discography, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Yves (talk) 22:45, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please use reliable sources. This edit clearly uses a fan site, which is not reliable. Please read WP:RS for further information. Thank you. Yves (talk) 22:45, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Missing (Flyleaf song), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Access Denied [FATAL ERROR] 21:19, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your recent additions to Missing (Flyleaf song) as they constituted copyright violations. Please read the policy and guidelins on copyright violations. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:18, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Playing God (song), to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Yves (talk) 04:54, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Playing God (song), as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Yves (talk) 04:54, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you checked the box by mistake, but this is certainly not a minor edit. Please do not re-create the page until it passes WP:NSONGS. Thank you. Yves (talk) 04:54, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Paramore

[edit]

Hi. Please read the note I left on Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Paramore. This is not a list of every award the band has ever won or been nominated for; we only list notable awards. As such, the Kerrang! Reader's Poll 2009 is not particularly notable, whereas the actual Kerrang ones are. The article must remain neutral and not turn into a fansite or anything like that. If you have a question about whether or not an award should be included, post on the talk page and we'll discuss. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 20:35, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, one other thing - that list page is about the band, and as such is restricted only to awards that the entire band has won. Awards won by any single member of the band (e.g. Hayley Williams) belongs on the member's page and not the band page. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 20:41, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Third time I'm asking you this - stop adding non-notable awards to this page. Things like Drowned In Sound's Top 50 Albums and Suosikki Magazine's Foreign album are unimportant. The list is not meant to be a fanpage or anything like that, so please stop editing like this. You may find yourself blocked if you continue to avoid discussing your edits and continue to just blindly add text to the article. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 21:10, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fourth time I'm posting here now. First, stop marking all your edits as minor; most of them are not. Secondly, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Not every award the band is nominated for makes it into this list. And showing up on top-# lists for videos and the like does not need to be included in this list either. This is only a list of notable awards that the band has either won or was nominated for. Above all, please discuss your edits before you readd them to the page. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 23:33, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to List of awards and nominations received by Paramore, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 20:49, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Playing God (song), you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Yves (talk) 20:39, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again, what part of WP:NSONG do you not understand? If you would like me to go over it, I'd be more than happy to. You have been told repeatedly the song is not notable enough to merit its own article, and it isn't. Please stop re-creating it. Yves (talk) 20:39, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Playing God (song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yves (talk) 20:45, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop, or you will be reported, again, and I don't think that is something you want. Yves (talk) 20:45, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Playing God (song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yves (talk) 01:04, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to warn you one last time now because I really don't want to report you and I really don't think you want me to, either. You have not responded to any messages left here, nor have you provided edit summaries. Please stop your disruptive editing. Thank you. Yves (talk) 01:04, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

[edit]

I've brought up your edit behavior at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Wholly uncooperative editor on Paramore-related articles. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 23:38, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Para.leaf, one of the rules about editing Wikipedia is that you do it with other editors. I have looked at your contributions, and you have never once discussed anything on an article or user talk page. Please come here and explain some of your edits. If you do not do so, I will be forced to block you. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 00:39, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Remenber to Live.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Remenber to Live.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:06, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Playinggodpossing.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Playinggodpossing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:25, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Paramore, again

[edit]

I've once again removed your edits to the page. Non-notable awards do not belong on the page, and ones such as the Kerrang Readers Awards are in that category. (The actual Kerrang awards, by contrast, do belong.) Before you readd that text to the page again, please read the comments I left above for you, and discuss on the talk page! — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 21:34, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please go to Talk:List of awards and nominations received by Paramore, read what I wrote there, and comment on it. Part of being a Wikipedia editor means discussing your edits. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 22:38, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paramore Playing God.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paramore Playing God.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:01, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paramore Playing God.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paramore Playing God.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:25, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Paramore, again

[edit]

Do not readd that text. Wikipedia isn't a repository for blog posts, and it's not a place to copypaste text like that. Edits like that are extremely disruptive, and continuing to edit like that can result in you being blocked from editing. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 19:01, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011, final warning

[edit]

Stop re-adding inappropriate, fan-based sources. Read the edit summaries and communication other editors are leaving. Enough disrupting this article.
This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Paramore discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - eo (talk) 13:42, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

[edit]

There is no reason to keep creating wikilinks that are red.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Flyleaf discography, you may be blocked from editing. - eo (talk) 17:45, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Flyleaf discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - eo (talk) 17:46, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Article title formatting

[edit]

Can you please read a few formatting guidelines before creating any more pages? You've made two today that had to be moved because of incorrect disamiguation and formatting errors. Please note that cover versions do not get a separate article. WP:NSONGS, WP:CHARTS, WP:SONGS. - eo (talk) 20:13, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:How he loves.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:How he loves.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:36, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paramore peru.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paramore peru.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:41, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Para.leaf, I was wondering why you look away the sales figures with this edit?
Michael Jester (Talk) 17:02, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Billboard 200. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - eo (talk) 14:29, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to expand on the Writing and Production section on Paramore (album) as the quote box on its own seems out of place. If you don't plan on adding more I think it's best if it's removed until there's more information on the article. SayPeanuts (talk) 20:45, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Paramore articles

[edit]

Hello, I'm SayPeanuts. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Paramore without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! SayPeanuts (talk) 21:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Paramore World Tour may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anklebiters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hipster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Cover paramore's song ain't it fun.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Cover paramore's song ain't it fun.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 02:45, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover paramore's song ain't it fun.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cover paramore's song ain't it fun.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:17, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Ain't It Fun 12.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ain't It Fun 12.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 17:45, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover paramore's song ain't it fun.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cover paramore's song ain't it fun.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:27, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Para.leaf. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ParamoresVideosAllofThemEver.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ParamoresVideosAllofThemEver.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]