User talk:Ramdosh
Warning regarding your disruptive editing
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing.
I noticed you recently edited the articles Bajirao I and Nizam's Carnatic Campiagns but these edits were not constructive so they have been reverted. You should refrain from such edits as all the information in those articles are supported by reliable sources (WP:RS).
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. This is specifically about the blanking of content with references and replacing it with OR content without references. You should also read about WP:OR.
Regards. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 08:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- According to Some historians Bajirao Participated but according to one he was present but didn't participated so we have to mention him in Nizam's Carnatic Campaigns Ramdosh (talk) 10:13, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- I understand your concern but there are various problems in this article;
- Firstly, this article's name is itself disputed and is not supported by any reliable source. The author who created it just named the article as per his/her believes. All the WP:RS sources checked by me doesn't mention any battle named Nizam's Carnatic Campaign (1725-27). Same is the case with the result section, I have come upon multiple sources which doesn't state Nizam victory. So these are broader concerns than adding Bajirao as the commander or not.
- My view is that article needs to be rewritten and the current one should be deleted.
- Besides, you should also read this; Template:Infobox military conflict, it clearly says only commanders of the battle are to be mentioned. Now, we can't add parameters like disputed, or according to this book/this author/etc beside the name of commanders as per the Wiki guidelines. For that more sources are required to reach a consensus.
- But suppose even if we finalize the commanders as per consensus and in the meantime article is deleted or largely changed as per the concern I addressed before we will again need a consensus for commanders,etc. So, let me address the problems with the article itself rather than individual commanders. We could address that after the problem with the article is resolved.
- Regards. Mohammad Umar Ali (talk) 11:53, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
June 2024
[edit]
Hello! I'm Flemmish Nietzsche. Your recent edit(s) to the page Gujarat Sultanate appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 21:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- The Gujarat sultanate's greatest extend was under Bahadur Shah of Gujarat, no source cited their to support it was under Mahmud Bageda Ramdosh (talk) 21:34, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted oder deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.