User talk:Rockchalk717/Archives/2019/December
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Chiefs
If you want me to walk you through the demographics of this I gladly will, without that statements the chiefs would leave to another city. That’s Probably the most important thing on there PanamanianBlanco (talk) 02:08, 9 December 2019 (UTC))
- @PanamanianBlanco: You fail to understand the number one issue I have with it. And that’s you including it in the opening. According to MOS:LEAD the opening establishes notability. What you want to include it has nothing to do with their notability in any way shape or form. Additionally I don’t believe it should be mentioned at all because of how old the source you are attempting to use is. Additionally, regardless of what the demographics say, how many season ticket holders are in Johnson county has zero impact on why they stay in KC, as long as they continue to sell season tickets, which they do.--Rockchalk717 02:47, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Additionally my issues with it have absolutely nothing to do the emotional response from people with the statement.--Rockchalk717 02:50, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
I’ll go find a newer one then. But yeah I assure you more Than half the people in the stadium are from Johnson County. And they would defiantly leave without that . Just like the basketball team did. Seems extremely notable. I’ll go find a newer one sometime PanamanianBlanco (talk) 02:53, 9 December 2019 (UTC))
- The above user is a sockpuppet and I've blocked them indefinitely. Eagles 24/7 (C) 15:12, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
@Eagles247: Oh wow. Ok. Can’t say I’m surprised with some of his behavior.--Rockchalk717 15:42, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- Luckily this prevents a lot of wasted time from good users that would have eventually ended with a block for either disruption, incompetency, or inability to work in a collaborative setting. Eagles 24/7 (C) 15:54, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Eagles247: Yeah something about this person screamed edit war. I was gonna leave it alone for a moment until some time had passed. Glad you identified them as being a sock puppet to get them blocked.--Rockchalk717 19:54, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
My talk page
Umm you didn't have to go on my talk page to say that. You could've just gone to the Terrell Suggs talk section. Don't know why you did that. TheBigMan720 (talk) 07:20, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- @TheBigMan720: Your talk page is actually the appropriate place for this discussion not the article talk page.--Rockchalk717 07:25, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
No it's not really sir. I know what I did wrong. Again you didn't have to go to my talk page for that. I wont mess with Terell Suggs page. Goodnight. TheBigMan720 (talk) 07:29, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- @TheBigMan720: Article talk page is for a resolution for a content dispute where multiple editors can get together to resolve an issue. This isn’t a content dispute. This was a misunderstanding of facts from a single editor, you, that needed additional explanation that couldn’t be handled in just an edit summary.--Rockchalk717 07:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)