Jump to content

User talk:Rodrigogomesonetwo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Rodrigogomesonetwo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 08:18, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

[edit]

FYI, dates are no longer linked by default, see MOS:UNLINKDATES.— TAnthonyTalk 05:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Poder Paralelo

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Poder Paralelo, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poder Paralelo. Thank you. Descíclope (talk) 22:40, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Frei Betto, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. StarM 00:52, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Sérgio Rezende. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing the "notable" tag from the Stuart Angel article without explaining just what makes him notable. People are killed by repressive government all the time, how is he any more notable than any other? Woogee (talk) 22:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then please provide sources that prove it. Woogee (talk) 22:40, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Stuart Angel

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Stuart Angel, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Angel. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Woogee (talk) 22:42, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dilma

[edit]

I've noticed you have a great interest on anything related to the Brazilian Worker's Party and Leftist subjects. You must understand that you can not change sourced content unless you bring reasons to it and discuss the matter with other editors. And most important of all: do not change it because for politic agenda. You like her? You want to vote on her? Fine. But this is an Enciclopaedia. do not forget that.

As you can see, I reverted your edits there and I also came into your talk page to warn you about your behavior. If you insist on doind that, I will report you and request your block. --Lecen (talk) 21:41, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have ignored my remarks, I will give you one more chance to revert your edit and discuss the matter. If you do not do that I will report you. --Lecen (talk) 21:42, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Vanessa Grazziotin has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Cindamuse (talk) 01:14, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All sourced up now! :D

Your edits

[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. — O'Dea 06:47, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Inauguration of Dilma Rousseff, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.buenosairesherald.com/PrintedEdition/moreNews/next/44419.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:42, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What's the deal?

[edit]

Hi, Rodrigo. Do you simply enjoy history articles or also write some? Regards, --Lecen (talk) 01:57, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's sad. At first, when I came here, my idea was to write the articles about Pedro II, Getúlio Vargas, Ernesto Geisel and Fernando Henrique Cardoso. The idea was to have articles that could tell Brazilian history from the 19th century to nowadays. But I've noticed that articles related to anything that happened from 1964 to the present-day have a bunch of editors far more worried on doing politics that actually writing for an ancyclopaedia. So I gave up and now I prefer to write articles from the 16th century to the 19th century, It's better, since there is no one who bothers to make them pieces of political propaganda. But thank you for answering back. Kind regards, --Lecen (talk) 03:48, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Cind.amuse 02:45, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't copy and paste one page to another. By doing so, you lose the original article's edit history and that's a copyright violation. Discuss moving the page to a different name on the original page's Talk page. Corvus cornixtalk 01:53, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Graziano Da Silva Photo

[edit]

Dear Rodrigo

Hi, this is Annika Vaughan who has started the entry of FAO's new DG elect Graciano da Silva. I have noticed that you removed the picture I uploaded (which I had permission to use from FAO) and replaced it with another picture. Would you mind letting me know why you did this and if there's any chance I could put the official portrait back?

Thank you,

AVaughan (talk) 10:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

Hi Rodrigogo Welcome to the Wright Challenge which is being presented at Wikimania tomoorow. I see that you are likely to submit new translation in Portueguese from Brazil. That would be great. We have some PT articles that were created in Brazil. Adding some more from the "translate" list would be great - regards Victuallers (talk) 14:31, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We have a space here reserved for you! and a barnstar when you get to 24 points (includes 2 languages) - cheers Victuallers (talk) 21:41, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Women

[edit]

Hey Rodrigo, something tells me you like your answers here :P. Funny that list, just like we discussed. Btw, could you send me an email via emailuser (or Taketa@wikipedia.be also works), and I'll send you the pictures I have from Wikimania you might be interested in. Also, could you give me the usernames of the other Brasilians? Cheers, Taketa (talk) 08:19, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

From Derby

[edit]
On 3rd September you can watch the LIVE WEBCAST here: meanwhile --

Thank you from the Wikimedia Foundation and
Thank you from Derby Museums
for your friendly participation in the Wright Challenge

This was the first multilingual Wikipedia collaboration. 51 Wikipedians took part, in at least 61 languages
Your contribution shows how we might work with any cultural institution, in any country ... that's the future of Wikipedia!

Andrew Dalby 12:18, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I need your assistance in developing and spreading a wikiproject. Can you help me in developing and spreading this page in wikipedia: Wikipedia:Wikipedia for World Heritage

Thank you and Happy editing Yasht101 :) 06:28, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Roman Catholicism in Brazil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Salvador, Palmas, Boa Vista, Vitória and Paraná

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Deutscher Morgen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pot of gold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Goiânia mayoral election, 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page G1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rodrigo

[edit]

We are having another party - Want to come? This is multi-lingual! Victuallers (talk) 10:13, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

'Gibraltarpedia in an international and muli-cultural collaboration'
'Gibraltarpedia in an international and muli-cultural collaboration'
Please translate the text below into the language of your wiki

We would like to invite you to contribute to the GibraltarpediA project, the world's first WIkipedia City. The project needs writers, photographers, translators and others to help build the first wiki city which bridges Europe and Africa. We are going to transform Gibraltar and the surrounding areas in Morocco and Spain into areas rich with encyclopedic content immediately accessible using QR codes and NFC on plaques for visitors and local people.

There are prizes to reward contributors in the Gibraltarpedia Multilingual challenge for the best editors, photographs and cartographers... whoever you are. More at Gibraltarpedia.org

'Gibraltarpedia in an international and multi-cultural collaboration'
'Gibraltarpedia in an international and multi-cultural collaboration'

Olá, tudo bem? Lembro que você votou na proposta pra destaque do artigo da cantora Cher em português e vi que você tem um nível avançado de inglês, então me senti a vontade pra falar contigo. Eu trabalhei durante alguns meses no artigo Cher e, há menos de um mês, o sugeri para artigo destacado. A maioria dos usuários destacou o bom conteúdo do artigo, porém houve consenso geral sobre as inconsistências nos pronomes e na redação em geral. Como meu nível de inglês é bastante iniciante, fiz o melhor que pude pra manter a redação o mais profissional possível, mas obviamente ainda há bastante erros. No entanto, todo o trabalho "duro" já foi feito: o conteúdo está completamente referenciado com fontes fidedignas e a pesquisa já está concluída. Os pontos em que o artigo peca são a redação e a formatação das referências. Posso (e vou) cuidar sozinho do último, mas, em relação a redação, não há muito que eu possa fazer. Posso contar com a sua ajuda? Sds, Lordelliott (talk) 02:08, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brazilian general election, 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page G1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of the socialist movement in Brazil may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • of [[Santos, São Paulo|Santos]], which soon published the socialist magazine ''A Questão Social'' (''The Social Question'' and newspaper ''O Socialista'' (''The Socialist'').

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:54, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

History of the socialist movement in Brazil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Komintern, Democratic Labour Party, Marxist-Leninist Communist Party and Ex-communist

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brazilian general election, 2014, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Partido Trabalhista Brasileiro and Partido Comunista Brasileiro. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Calendar of saints (Episcopal Anglican Church of Brazil), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.cyclopaedia.de/wiki/Calendar_of_saints_(Church_of_England).

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:02, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anglican Episcopal Church of Brazil, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Salvador and Henry Martin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Rodrigogomesonetwo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Data of Lula's approval ratings?

[edit]

Hi. Regarding your image on Commons, Lula_approval_rating.PNG, you mention in the description CNT/Sensus is the source, but you do not provide a reference. Is the data available anywhere? I searched everywhere but could not find it. I want to reproduce your plot with R for better aesthetics. Saturnalia0 (talk) 16:02, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Rodrigogomesonetwo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Rodrigogomesonetwo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Security recommendation

[edit]

Hello Rodrigogomesonetwo - This is to let you know that there has been a recent rash of account compromises, which appear to relate to links to social media websites that appear on userpages. I note you have a lot of links on your page. I'd like to suggest that you consider deleting these links. At a bare minimum, it is really important that you ensure that your Wikipedia password is not the same as the password for any of those sites, several of which have had security breaches. Thanks very much for your continued work on Wikipedia. All the best, Risker (talk) 05:04, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note about account security

[edit]

Hello Rodrigogomesonetwo - I'm not sure if you are aware of this, but Wikipedia recently had a spate of user account compromises. After investigation, it appeared that at least a significant issue involved in these compromises was that the Wikipedia editor had also used the same or similar password on a social media website that was posted on their userpage. Many major social media sites, including Myspace and Yahoo, have had major security breaches where user passwords were leaked.

I note that you have included links to external social media sites on your userpage. I'd suggest removing the links; however, if you choose not to do so, please ensure that you are using a unique password for your Wikipedia account that is not used on any of these other sites. Thanks very much. Risker (talk) 02:17, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

1- Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Brazil, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages G1 and SBT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


2- Thanks for helping with the syntax of the topics, it was a great job. However, we suggest that you be more careful about the contributions of other users. Take care not to modify or alter the information posted previously, unless it is justified and notified to the user beforehand, the reason for which he is modifying the information of his research. Leízo Araujo de Souza (talk) 19:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Today we had a hard time to replace modified, incomplete and deleted messages from other users. Again, thanks for your contributions! Leízo Araujo de Souza (talk) 19:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

3- We noticed that you cited discontinued and loose phrases, taken from another user's search, followed by invalid references. We suggest that you take a closer look at this issue. Leízo Araujo de Souza (talk) 21:14, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Each topic and sub topic in the article has its days in ascending order. Please look for the day corresponding to your search when inserting or reformulating any changes such as the syntax for example, that you made this morning. Thanks! Leízo Araujo de Souza (talk) 21:14, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Billboard Argentina Hot 100 number-one singles of 2021, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tini.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

[edit]
Wishing Rodrigogomesonetwo a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee!   Chris Troutman (talk) 01:11, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday

[edit]
Happy Birthday from the Birthday Committee

Wishing Rodrigogomesonetwo a very happy birthday on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!

Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake!--Ezra Cricket (talk) 07:10, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

[edit]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]