User talk:Rolyat87

Thank you for displaying your inability to understand science. There are scientifically only TWO genders. To conduct a sex change is to only change the anatomy of one's body, not the genetics. To psychologically feel you are a boy when a girl or to feel as a girl when a boy doesn't make you genetically that. The science has proven this. Thank you!

Welcome

Hello, Rolyat87, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Rolyat87, good luck, and have fun. Schazjmd (talk) 16:04, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CLCStudent (talk) 22:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism? Not sure what your talking about. Facts where stated. Rolyat87 (talk) 22:43, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, I see that you are Democratic. Does that have anything to do with you unjuat comment and slander towards me? Rolyat87 (talk) 22:45, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- LuK3 (Talk) 22:57, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your claims are prejudice. Based souly on the political differences and views from CLCStudent. It has been confirmed by the Supreme Court Biden fraudulently tampered with the elections. Rolyat87 (talk) 23:05, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanction Notifications

Looks like you've have trouble separating your views from your editing. Thus, please be aware of the following:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

EvergreenFir (talk) 06:18, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:00, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For clarity, 11 of the 19 mainspace edits by this user were vandalism or POV-pushing related to American politics and transgender people. Seven of those edits had misleading edit summaries. EvergreenFir (talk) 18:04, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal blocked account

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Rolyat87 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

no explanation was ever give to why I was blocked. All that was stated was that I was not contributing to an encyclopedia. My changes where those based on science. If the science is not something that editors or administrators wish to follow, then the ones above them need to step up and block or restrict their subordinates. "Fact checking" without facts one the part of editors or administrators is an abuse of power. Rolyat87 (talk) 01:55, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Based on Special:Diff/993307403, I think it's pretty obvious that you have no interest in facts and have no business editing an encyclopedia based on facts, and we're not going to waste time arguing with a troll. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

!helper

!helper Rolyat87 (talk) 02:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]