User talk:Rubenambriz

Welcome!

Hello, Rubenambriz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Muzammil (talk) 19:27, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

There's no need to put in the news about The 100 being renewed by The CW on the 2014–15 United States network television schedule page twice. AdamDeanHall (talk) 21:29, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of The 100 (TV series) Characters

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of List of The 100 (TV series) Characters, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: List of The 100 characters. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:45, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of The 100 (TV series) Characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christopher Larkin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm Adabow. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Buzzcut Season without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Adabow (talk) 09:06, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Don't do this

Don't try to revert your edits in the elimination chart or else i will report this as vandalism. 87Stone (talk) 07:23, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- No you leave the chart alone. You didn't follow the format of the chart from the previous pages of Idol so don't try to revert it back. 87Stone (talk) 07:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- This format when semifinalists who were advanced as finalists in the chart doesn't have top 16 on it so they were declared safe. Don't add top 16, or 1st or 2nd on the finalists cause the safe contestants were in white not in blue. 87Stone (talk) 07:32, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:41, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are really annoying

I don't know what is your problem and you kept harrassing me and my talk page every time i make an edit to this page you think this is yours right? well you were wrong you are an insulting prick who kept harassing my talk page and you kept tampering the chart you are just jealous of my edits. Well go ahead keep harassing me before you will be blocked for harassing an editor 87Stone (talk) 08:49, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Think again, you know that. You are just an insignificant child who kept reacting as a baby to my edits. You think you were right but you were wrong you are really an insignificant bully who just thinks that you were right all along. 87Stone (talk) 08:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:87Stone, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
A series of edits such as this are unacceptable. 220 of ^Borg 08:29, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

Thank you for your Jax (Singer). However, the article is...way too short, and it's been tagged for deletion. To decrease the chances of it getting deleted, can you help me expand it to be more than "Jax is a singer"? Thank you. Zeke Essiestudy (talk) 03:16, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jax (Singer)

The article Jax (Singer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Reality show contestants are not inherently notable people; there's nothing else to show in the article that she is, plus there's a dearth of sources giving in-depth coverage of her.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —C.Fred (talk) 13:50, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Elimination chart

Then how do you explain the situation in the Top 13 results for season 11? Elise Testone wasn't eliminated, she was saved by the judges, and in the elimination chart it was labelled that she was "saved". Talking about consistency here. And the contestants who were up for the Judges' Save WERE NOT OFFICIALLY ELIMINATED till the judges made the verdict whether to use the save or not. So I'm not sure what you are talking about. DerricktanJCW (talk) 06:48, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I suggest you go back and watch the season again because the Top 13 save was not considered as a judges' save.

Elise Testone and Jeremy Rosado were at risk of elimination. Elise could be the one with the lowest number of votes and supposedly the one that was going home, but Jeremy was eliminated instead. Same thing for this season, Rayvon could be the one with the lowest number of votes every single week, but he was SAVED and the other contestant in the bottom 2 eliminated instead. Indicating "bottom 2" in the chart makes it seem like he was the one with the second lowest number of votes, which may not be true.

And so what if the elimination chart for the other seasons are different from the current season? This season has different way of elimination, and of course there would be a different presentation method.DerricktanJCW (talk) 16:43, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rubenambriz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of the 100 character

Hello, Rubenambriz. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of the 100 character".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]