User talk:Sir 68 G A178

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Resilience (materials science), may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! DanCherek (talk) 02:35, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Resilience (materials science) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 17:39, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jessicapierce,

How can you decide that my contributions are not constructive and who has given you the authority to remove my contribution? All my contributions regarding Material Resilience are based on my published literature already available as References. Please read and try to understand the works reported in my publications. These publications of myself are reproduced below.

Guha S. Quantification of inherent energy resilience of process systems for optimization of energy usage. Environ Prog Sustainable Energy. 2019;e13308. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13308

Guha S. Quantification of inherent energy resilience of process systems pertaining to a gas sweetening unit. International Journal of Industrial Chemistry (2020) 11:71–90 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40090-020-00203-3

I will include my contribution once again if you do not undo removal of my contribution immediately.

With regards

Dr. Sirshendu Guha Sir 68 G A178 (talk) 07:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I have again had to remove your contributions to Resilience (materials science). There are several reasons. Your additions were filled with formatting, punctuation, and other errors. These were significant, and would need to be addressed before resubmitting the content.

You are welcome to edit Wikipedia, but adding your own work as a source is extremely frowned upon. I'll attach an automated message about conflicts of interest below.

Please do not re-add your article again before these issues are resolved. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 14:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sir 68 G A178. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Resilience (materials science), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 14:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jessicapierce,

I will rephrase the contribution so that the contents do not seem to be promotion of my own work. The contents will also be thoroughly checked for formatting, punctuations etc. Please note that the contents are basically synopsis of part of the published literature which are available as References and I am only the best suited person to prepare the synopsis as I only have the deepest insight into the fundamentals of the reported works on material resilience which have been published in reputed international journals and conference proceedings. Also, please note that there is no conflict of interest to be disclosed for the subject work.

I hope, the explanations given above will be satisfactory to you. Please note that the existing contents as available in Wikipedia on Resilience (material science) is very limited and too trivial in nature.

With regards

Dr. Sirshendu Guha Sir 68 G A178 (talk) 07:05, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sir 68 G A178 I have reverted your additions to the article again. Please read Wikipedia's guideline on contributions by users with a conflict of interest, as well as Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Specifically, in general you should not be editing any articles you have a conflict of interest on. Additionally Wikipedia mandates a specific style for articles, which your recent edits don't confirm to. Thanks in advance, -- Asartea ^Talk ^| ^Contribs 17:56, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Resilience (materials science). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Katie^talk 20:17, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]