Jump to content

User talk:SlavPoland

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Witaj! / Welcome!

Hello, SlavPoland, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - Darwinek 20:24, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
Hello SlavPoland! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Portal:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with us.

Appleseed (Talk) 00:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can we think this naming issue thorugh? I know that the formal name of the synagogue is Chevra Lomdei Mishnayot Synagogue. Problem is, as long as this is the name of the page, no one witll ever find the place on a google search. The page got exactly fory hits last month. http://stats.grok.se/en/200806/Chevra%20Lomdei%20Mishnayot%20Synagogue Most shuls, as you probably know, have formal names, and popular names, I.e., the names that people actually know them by, remember, and look up. I think Auschwitz Synagogue is the best name for this synagogue.Elan26 (talk) 00:51, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Elan26[reply]

Yes, I do know that Oświęcim is a town, and Auschwitz is a concentration camp. I have visited Oświęcim, which is a very pretty town the residents of which are, of course, not respnsible for what the Germans dis at Auschwitz. However, the name Auschwitz is not only the German name for the town of Oświęcim, it it the common english name for the town, and for the synagogue. It is the name used by the New York Times (Auschwitz Synagogue to Reopen, Bringing 'Hopes of the Future ...query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C07E1D8153DF935A25755C0A96E958260 ) the BBC (BBC News | Europe | Auschwitz synagogue to be rededicated news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/211411.stm ) and other English language news media when discussing this synagogue. This is an English-language encyclopedia. Therefore the name Auschwitz synagogue is correct.

It is also the fact that throughout Europe, synagogues regularly take the name of the town they are in, desipte the fact that they have formal, Hebrew names as the Chevra Lomdei Mishnayot Synagogue does. See, for example, Sarajevo Synagogue, Czernowitz Synagogue, Hobart Synagogue Old Synagogue at Canterbury...Elan26 (talk) 12:20, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Elan26[reply]

Wlodawa Synagogue

[edit]

New article, Wlodawa Synagogue, although you might have something useful to add.Historicist (talk) 18:51, 4 December 2008 (UTC)Historicist[reply]

just fyi.Historicist (talk) 16:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Polish geography

[edit]

Can you look at the problem I have at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wolpa_Synagogue. There are many, wonderful, detailed, illustrated sources on this synagogue. But, I am uncertain about the location of the town.Historicist (talk) 16:14, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Smile!

[edit]
A Barnstar!
A smile for you

You’ve just received a random act of kindness! 129.49.73.32 (talk) 17:20, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SlavPoland. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Albert Stankowski, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Albert Stankowski to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]