User talk:Sofie May Green

Welcome!

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello Sofie May Green, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:CheFEM 3 Software to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

The Teahouse - ask Wikipedians for general editing help
Articles for Creation Help Desk - ask reviewers for draft article help
Creating your first article
Referencing for beginners
Wikipedia Manual of Style

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liance^talk 19:37, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CheFEM 3 Software (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by WikiDan61 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft's sources all appear to be papers that may have used this software as part of their analysis (difficult to say from just the abstracts), but which are clearly not about this software, so we have no evidence that this is notable software.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CheFEM 3 Software and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sofie May Green! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WikiDan61,

Thank you for your feedback on my Wikipedia draft. I’d like to address your concerns about the sources.

Full Article Content: Your review was based on abstracts. The full articles provide detailed discussions on the software’s role and impact, showcasing its significance in various studies.
Notability Through Use: The software's widespread use in research, even if not the main focus, demonstrates its critical role and utility in the field.
Industrial Impact: The software is also extensively used in industry, highlighting its practical importance and further supporting its notability.

I am gathering additional references, including industry case studies, to strengthen the draft.

I respectfully request reconsideration of the draft with these points in mind.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Dr. Sofie Green (PhD) Sofie May Green (talk) 07:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]