User talk:Surfmonkey707
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Surfmonkey707, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Historicism (Christianity) does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.
There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! tgeorgescu (talk) 03:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- After reading the NPOV, I fail to see the problem, could you explain. why the edit fails the neutral point of view.
- I have been a historicist all my life and there has never been anyone that has ever said that Antiocus has anything to do the interpretation of Daniel 9. This is either an error on the part of the author or it is a back handed swipe at different interpretation of Daniel 8 Surfmonkey707 (talk) 03:35, 20 November 2023 (UTC)