User talk:TheRee1Dog

June 2020

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Ben Schwartz. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Dr. K. 23:44, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Steve Martin, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:09, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 18:13, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hello, I'm 5 albert square. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shane Richie have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. 5 albert square (talk) 02:14, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you professor TheRee1Dog (talk) 07:15, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unconstructive change

Hi there, though your first submission[1] of content at Cult following was well-meaning and appreciated, this resubmission is not constructive. When another editor reverts you, your recourse is to open a discussion on the article's talk page to seek consensus for the change you want, not to resubmit it. This is a collaborative encyclopedia, so it's important to discuss things rather than trying to force your preference onto the community, and this sort of behaviour we call edit-warring. Thanks and regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:20, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Trey Parker, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 20:24, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Charlotte Crosby. – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 23:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Arkwright (Open All Hours), you may be blocked from editing. David J Johnson (talk) 11:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Graham Chapman, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:46, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

John Cleese

Please stop making these unsourced changes to this page. You will continue to be reverted if you do. Rodericksilly (talk) 00:40, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to The Great Mouse Detective have been removed because you cited the information you added to IMDb. As discussed at WP:RS/IMDb, IMDb is considered a questionable source, and generally should not be used as a sole reference. You are welcome to re-add the information using a different reliable source, or with an additional source confirming the information from IMDb. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 18:21, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Christian Bale, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 11:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Christian Bale. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KyleJoan^talk 17:15, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article)) for a long term pattern of problematic edits, and an apprent refusal to adapt your aproach or to communicate with other users in any way.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:53, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that this [2] is the only time you have ever spoken to another user shows that you are aware of the litany of messages that have been left here about your problematic edits, and reflects a dismissive attitude that is not compatible with a collaborative project. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:55, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Special ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.

Please note, due to a technical error you may not have been able to previously vote, or you may have received this message twice or after opting out. This is a one-time notification. If you are having any issues voting now, please contact the election coordinators for assistance. Thank you!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]