User talk:Writerpankajverma

This is Writerpankajverma's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome

Hello, Writerpankajverma, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 12:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elwa Saleh (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elwa Saleh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Elwa Saleh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 12:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Writerpankajverma! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 12:54, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Elwa Saleh

Hello, Writerpankajverma. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Elwa Saleh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Writerpankajverma. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.

Please do not add links to your own websites. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 16:16, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Other points about reliable sources

Writerpankajverma, in addition to your own websites usamenuprices.com, everymenuprices.com, and tikwikitok.com, you have also used sites such as wikilogy.com and marathibio.com, which are scraper sites that can't be used as sources in Wikipedia, and nettv4u which is considered an unreliable site (this is a helpful list of sources that should not be used in articles about Indian actors, movies, and TV shows). In this edit to Shambar, an article about a South American dish, you added a link to a source talking about a different dish. Please be more careful to check any sources you add to Wikipedia. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 16:55, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Elwa Saleh

Hello, Writerpankajverma. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Elwa Saleh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:17, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Cat12zu3. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Checkers and Rally's have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. re Special:Diff/1233915339 one spam link to unofficial website about that restaurant without any relation to that restaurant --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 17:33, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Writerpankajverma! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Checkers and Rally's that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. re Special:Diff/1233915339 adding citation is substantial (unlike spelling/grammar/formatting correction etc) and henced WP:NOTMINOR --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 17:33, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Writerpankajverma! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Bra that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. re Special:Diff/1234300728 adding external link is substantial (unlike spelling/grammar/formatting correction etc) and henced WP:NOTMINOR --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 17:33, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Writerpankajverma! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Clothing sizes that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. re Special:Diff/1232413490 adding external link is substantial (unlike spelling/grammar/formatting correction etc) and henced WP:NOTMINOR --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 17:42, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cat12zu3. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Elevation Burger have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. re Special:Diff/1218215704 spam link to unofficial price list website about that restaurant without relationship with that restaurant --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 19:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Writerpankajverma! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Elevation Burger that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. re Special:Diff/1218215704 adding citation, especially irrelevant cite, is substantial (unlike spelling/grammar/formatting correction etc) and henced WP:NOTMINOR --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 19:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cat12zu3. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Elevation Burger in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. -- re Special:Diff/1218215704 misleading summary edit claiming to be about restuarant area served actually a spam ad link instead, is fraudulent --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 19:08, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Wing Zone. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. re Special:Diff/1214972586 spam link to unofficial price list website about that restaurant without relationship with that restaurant --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 19:29, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Wing Zone. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. re Special:Diff/1214972586 misleading summary edit claiming to be about restuarant area served actually a spam ad link instead, is fraudulent --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 19:29, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Writerpankajverma! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Wing Zone that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. re Special:Diff/1214972586 adding citation, especially irrelevant cite, is substantial (unlike spelling/grammar/formatting correction etc) and henced WP:NOTMINOR --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 19:29, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cat12zu3 thanks for letting me know about the things i was doing wrong.

I have checked the rules of "Minor edit" and will keep that in mind next time.

Regarding edit summaries, i tried to provide to the point summaries of the things i changed/replaced/added in the article. I don't think i have added any misleading summaries.

Here in this article, Clothing sizes, i have added a reliable tool which helps in measuring the clothing sizes. That's not my site nor i am associated with it. Moderators have approved the reference before you as they found it useful. Removing it now doesn't make any sense to me :( Writerpankajverma (talk) 10:24, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re Special:Diff/1233154294, that Dress Size Calculator doesn't mentioned what is in that paragraph you had linked, so it should be in (External Link) section, I'm not obligated to change it to correct location for you, especially since these link are WP:SELFPUBLISH, also WP:SELFPUBLISH links are discouraged.

Also Special:Diff/1214972586 & Special:Diff/1218215704 edit summary are fraudulent becuase you claim that inappropriate links you are "reliable citation", when at that time, your WP:SELFPUBLISH links didn't specifically mentioned relating to the wiki article paragraph. You then later change your WP:SELFPUBLISH content to add same wiki WP:CIRCULAR content to your WP:SELFPUBLISH content and claiming your WP:SELFPUBLISH website as WP:RS. (In fact, there are traces of wiki link in your WP:SELFPUBLISH website Wing Zone page as of now.)

Apparently your edits contain your own WP:SELFPUBLISH website, and claiming to be WP:RS, which is inappropriate in wikipedia for WP:PROMOTION promoting your own WP:SELFPUBLISH website.

Lastly, you had yet to declare all of your WP:SELFPUBLISH website in your User page per WP:COI --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 10:50, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Moderators have approved the reference before you as they found it useful, can you show which one? All I see was complains about WP:COI and WP:NONRS #Other points about reliable sources, which is about your WP:SELFPUBLISH website. You had yet to declare your WP:COI WP:SELFPUBLISH website on your User page, and WP:PROMOTION of your WP:SELFPUBLISH websites is a no-no. --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 11:37, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]