User talk:Xaozon
Welcome!
Hello, Xaozon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- MightyWarrior 09:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Very short articles
[edit]You have created a number of very short articles, most of which are essentially empty (see criteria for speedy deletion). Please expand these to include evidence of their significance per WP:SOFTWARE, otherwise they are liable to be deleted. Just zis Guy you know? 15:04, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- In answer to your question: they need to establish the context. Year, platforms, sales figures, an idea of how long they were produced, any unique or notable features, some idea of the genre, type of gameplay and so on. Also evidence of meeting the criteria at WP:SOFTWARE. Just zis Guy you know? 15:12, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
You also like to get a hard penis up your tight butthole. This can be done here!
Redirect page syntax
[edit]Hi, I've noticed you used some incorrect syntax when creating redirect pages. When you create redirect pages (such as NHL 92), you shouldn't put the full url in the link, just the name of the article, like this:
- #REDIRECT [[NHL series]]
Just so you know for the future. BryanG(talk) 06:36, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- Whoops, I should be more careful with my examples, now it would redirect to NHL series. BryanG(talk) 06:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
contribution to list of collector... etc
[edit]Appreciate the effort, and although the game might be "special" - the real nature of the list is limited editions. Since this would be a re-release and not strictly limited - it doesnt have a place in the list. The problem becomes if we allow it - the how many "extras" does a re-release need before it is "special" enough to be included on the list? The article was originally deleted largely for being too indiscriminate. Keeping the focused narrowed by not including non-limited editions will help acheive that. Deusfaux 08:49, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 15:31, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
An article that you created, Computer Quarterback, was proposed for deletion, probably yesterday. Please review the policy on proposed deletion and feel free to comment on the article's talk page. If no contest is made, the article will be deleted in four days from today.--Kungfu Adam (talk) 22:48, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
- Cosmoserve has also been proposed for deletion. NickelShoe (Talk) 02:03, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Tapan Kaikki: Bloodshed
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tapan Kaikki: Bloodshed, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Marasmusine (talk) 09:30, 17 July 2008 (UTC)