User talk:Zwetelina

Welcome

Hello, Zwetelina, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dick Clark 19:22, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yoda

Thanks for adding the succession box to Yoda and Luke Skywalker, but there is no evidence that such a title as "Grand Jedi Master of the Jedi Order" exists/ed. Sorry, but I've removed the boxes. – Xolatron 23:30, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Xolatron!

In Wookiepedia, it stands that Yoda was a Grand Jedi master of the Old Jedi Order. It stands also that luke Skywalker succeeded him as Grand jedi Master of the New Jedi Order. I don't know why you edited the page again and took the succesion box away, which was hard to create for me (I'm new here).

Your Zwetelina

I'm very sorry, you are completely right. I should have looked on Wookieepedia. I'll put back the boxes right away. By the way, I was impressed with the boxes, they were perfect, and I've never seen a new user do so well right away. Welcome to Wikipedia, and sorry. They'll be back in a few minutes. – Xolatron 19:08, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've done it, your boxes are back. Once again you were entirely correct to put them there and I'm really sorry that I reverted them. By the way, to get previous content back, you can always click the history tab above a page and then click on the date of the past article, from which you can click edit to see the code for. Good editing :). – Xolatron 19:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Xolatron,

it doesn't matter. Thank you for the complement!! It was very nice. I hope that we can talk also about other things.

Greetings

Your Zwetelina

P.S.: My English isn't so good. I'm from Bulgaria. But I live in Germany because therre is life better then in Bulgaria. So it is maby a little bit difficult for you to understand me.

Don't worry, your English is good. It's not difficult to understand you at all. I'm amazed that you speak English so well. I'm taking Spanish and would be crazy to try to talk on the Spanish Wikipedia :).

Ellie of Naboo

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Ellie of Naboo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:02, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ellie of Naboo

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ellie of Naboo, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:43, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]