Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/.2 Network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. This one is funky, as the nomination is no longer on the article, and the AFD was on no daily log. No prejudice against proper renomination, despite this being a keep. Courcelles 23:26, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

.2 Network

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As quoted by user 98.88.176.57, "it was a planned network that never got past the planning stages. All of the information is not even verifiable as of May 2011 and could therefore be challenged as having no source." 76.235.248.47 (talk) 05:47, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Although, if the network never fully launched, can't it still be kept just as a past tense focused article? It has strong references such as The Columbus Dispatch. SwisterTwister (talk) 06:15, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as subject easily crosses the verifiability and notability thresholds with references to reliable third-party sources. That the network never launched does not bar it from being notable. (See Paramount Network Television for just one example.) - Dravecky (talk) 20:32, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The page should definitely be updated with new information and new sources, but it's clearly notable enough based on the existing sources. Richwales (talk · contribs) 04:13, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.