Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 US Open of Curling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Killiondude (talk) 07:32, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018 US Open of Curling

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable future event. I'm not sure if curling is notable enough of a sport to have an article for this specific tournament. Perhaps this page could be redirected to US Open of Curling. Natg 19 (talk) 08:02, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sport-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 08:02, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 08:39, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It Is a notable Sport there is lots of other event pages Curler1200 (talk) 23:16, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ITSNOTABLE, WP:OTHERSTUFF. Please explain how this is notable. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 06:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. One of the major World Curling Tour events held in the United States and is a warm-up for the upcoming Olympics for the US teams. Though, I can understand that at present the article lacks sufficient sources and formatting issues to stand on its own. -- Earl Andrew - talk 23:00, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article does need work, but I agree with what's been stated by Earl Andrew. Also, the winners (and several participants in the event) are notable per WP:NCURL and have participated in events held by the World Curling Federation and Canadian Curling Association, the two most important curling associations in the world. Prayerfortheworld (talk) 04:33, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.