Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/201 Bishopsgate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Broadgate Tower. Sandstein 23:04, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

201 Bishopsgate

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Should be merged with Broadgate Tower and changed to a redirect to the above. Nerd1a4i (talk) 17:19, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 17:22, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 17:22, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete and redirect it's a duplicate article for a skyscraper known by a more common name. SportingFlyer (talk) 18:22, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect, there are attribution issues with just redirecting. Huon (talk) 18:55, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect per Huon. The Mighty Glen (talk) 07:55, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
redirect to Broadgate Tower per WP:OVERLAP. Coolabahapple (talk) 19:15, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:18, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Broadgate Tower. I see no reason why we need to delete before redirecting. --Michig (talk) 19:17, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.